-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 80
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat: Capa problem types submenu [FC-0059] #1207
feat: Capa problem types submenu [FC-0059] #1207
Conversation
Thanks for the pull request, @ChrisChV! What's next?Please work through the following steps to get your changes ready for engineering review: 🔘 Get product approvalIf you haven't already, check this list to see if your contribution needs to go through the product review process.
🔘 Provide contextTo help your reviewers and other members of the community understand the purpose and larger context of your changes, feel free to add as much of the following information to the PR description as you can:
🔘 Get a green buildIf one or more checks are failing, continue working on your changes until this is no longer the case and your build turns green. 🔘 Let us know that your PR is ready for review:Who will review my changes?This repository is currently maintained by Where can I find more information?If you'd like to get more details on all aspects of the review process for open source pull requests (OSPRs), check out the following resources:
When can I expect my changes to be merged?Our goal is to get community contributions seen and reviewed as efficiently as possible. However, the amount of time that it takes to review and merge a PR can vary significantly based on factors such as:
💡 As a result it may take up to several weeks or months to complete a review and merge your PR. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@ChrisChV The filter works nicely except for few cases as mentioned below:
vokoscreenNG-2024-08-15_16-27-11.mp4
return [...currentFilters, e.target.value]; | ||
}); | ||
}, [setBlockTypesFilter]); | ||
|
||
return ( | ||
<SearchFilterWidget | ||
appliedFilters={blockTypesFilter.map(blockType => ({ label: <BlockTypeLabel type={blockType} /> }))} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We should also clear problemTypeFilters on Clear Filter
click no?
This comment is about line 216 clearFilter={() => setBlockTypesFilter([])}
, as it is not part of the diff, I cannot directly comment on it.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
// To filter normal block types and problem types as 'OR' query | ||
const typeFilters = [[ | ||
...blockTypesFilterFormatted, | ||
...problemTypesFilterFormatted, | ||
].flat()]; | ||
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
vokoscreenNG-2024-08-15_16-28-28.mp4
Because of the OR condition between block types and problem types, filtering problem types after selecting whole problem block does not work. We can probably remove problem block type if problem types are selected.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Updated: f744344
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #1207 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 93.02% 93.06% +0.04%
==========================================
Files 756 756
Lines 13730 13777 +47
Branches 2917 2984 +67
==========================================
+ Hits 12772 12822 +50
+ Misses 923 920 -3
Partials 35 35 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@ChrisChV Nice! Added some suggestions, feel free to ignore them 👍
- I tested this by filtering problem blocks in different combinations.
- I read through the code
- I checked for accessibility issues
- Includes documentation
Just one question about the filter behaviour: The filter button doesn't show any data related to problem subtypes:
Is this expected?
I asked here: #1196 (comment) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
👍 Works perfectly. Great work @ChrisChV !
- I tested this using the PR instructions.
- I read through the code
- I checked for accessibility issues by using my keyboard alone to navigate.
- Includes documentation (code comments)
- User-facing strings are extracted for translation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Nice!
Thanks @ChrisChV. Go ahead and merge at your convenience when the build is green. |
@ChrisChV 🎉 Your pull request was merged! Please take a moment to answer a two question survey so we can improve your experience in the future. |
Description
This PR adds a new submenu in the problem filter menu item to filter by Capa Problem Types.
Supporting information
Testing instructions
tutor dev run cms bash
and./manage.py cms reindex_studio
to recreate the index