Various table fixes #1833
Various table fixes #1833
Conversation
| &.text-left { | ||
| text-align: left; | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| &.text-align\:right { | ||
| &.text-right { | ||
| text-align: right; | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| &.text-align\:center { | ||
| &.text-center { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
These classes were changed in executablebooks/MyST-Parser#450
| display: table; | ||
| overflow: auto; | ||
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
A bit of flip-flop history here:
- In force table to fit in the article width #717,
display: blockandoverflow: autorules are applied to all table elements, which previously were restricted to tables within section elements - In Fix several CSS elements and bugs for Sphinx 5 #818,
display: blockwas changed todisplay: table
As I discuss in issue #1824, it's probably a bad idea to change the display property of a table element since that might strip it of its semantics. And there's no need to explicitly put display: table on the table element, because that's what browsers assume.
As for the overflow rule, it only made sense when the table had display: block, as I discuss in PR #1827.
So to reduce head-scratching for future devs, I'm removing both rules.
Why a so old version of MyST?
Thanks! |
I think what was meant are "this changes has been introduced in myst 0.16 in 2021, so are not recent, therefore safe", not "we want to align to an old version of myst". |
Correct. That's my justification for not leaving a backwards-compatibility layer. |
This PR makes a few changes to the _tables.scss file: - Matches our table alignment classes with an [update to MyST from 2021](executablebooks/MyST-Parser#450) (version [0.16.0](https://github.com/executablebooks/MyST-Parser/releases/tag/v0.16.0)) - Removes the redundant and useless `display: table` and `overflow: auto` rules - Updates a comment Fixes pydata#1804.
This PR makes a few changes to the _tables.scss file:
display: tableandoverflow: autorulesFixes #1804.