Splitted docs

[cheld]

• Moved development part into separate document

• Assumed that binaries will be named according to openstack release

metric-agent-pike.run
log-agent-pike.run
monasca-ui-pike.run

Adjusted docs accordingly

[cheld]

Can you upload a release package? so releases is non-emmpty?

[cheld]

@samirjorina, @digitalfishpond please have a look

[digitalfishpond]

Just to confirm, here: do you want to remove the user's ability to specify a logstash version at the time of creating the log-agent installer? Or do you just want to reduce the name of the .run file to not include the logstash version?

[cheld]

You have to distinguish between user and developer. It is ok that a developer (you) to specify the logstash version. However, does it makes sense for users that search for a package on the releases page to include library version numbers into monasca artifact names? What happens if you fix the shell scritps and create a new download package? Do you keep the same version number? Sounds very strange to me.

To answer you question: in my understanding the version should be aligned with monasca version. How should a user know what to download in case the artifacts are not named cohesively ?

E.g. lets say you have installed Monasca version 'pike', than a user probably wants to download a package named pike as well