Skip to content

Issues: ietf-wg-cellar/ebml-specification

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

13 Open 88 Closed
13 Open 88 Closed
Author
Filter by author
Loading
Label
Filter by label
Loading
Use alt + click/return to exclude labels
or ⇧ + click/return for logical OR
Projects
Filter by project
Loading
Milestones
Filter by milestone
Loading
Assignee
Filter by who’s assigned
Sort
Sort by
Newest Oldest Most commented Least commented Recently updated Least recently updated Best match
Most reactions
👍 👎 😄 🎉 😕 ❤️ 🚀 👀

Issues list

Element range attribute excludes the Binary type bug enhancement Add more content to the document, explaning more things errata-rfc8794 Errors found in RFC 8794
#423 opened Feb 27, 2023 by hubblec4
3
create a new document containing all errata and additions to RFC 8794 errata-rfc8794 Errors found in RFC 8794
#412 opened Jun 20, 2021 by robUx4 new-rfc
1
3
range attribute vs restriction element bug errata-rfc8794 Errors found in RFC 8794
#410 opened May 30, 2021 by robUx4 new-rfc
1
Writing elements with a default value if the element can be multiple clarifications Improve the readability and comprehension of the specs errata-rfc8794 Errors found in RFC 8794
#409 opened May 27, 2021 by hubblec4 new-rfc
8
Element type default values (not the attribute "default") bug errata-rfc8794 Errors found in RFC 8794
#403 opened Mar 31, 2021 by hubblec4 new-rfc
5
RFC changed semantics wrt. default values & non-mandatory elements bug
#394 opened Feb 2, 2021 by mbunkus
14
there is no 'minver' attribute for enum values enhancement Add more content to the document, explaning more things XML Schema EBML Schema validation
#390 opened Sep 22, 2020 by robUx4 new-rfc
default values in text specifications should be around double quotes clarifications Improve the readability and comprehension of the specs formatting Fix formating issues, rearrange the content
#295 opened Oct 22, 2019 by robUx4 new-rfc
1
address conflict between unwritten minOccurs attribute and implementation note clarifications Improve the readability and comprehension of the specs formatting Fix formating issues, rearrange the content XML Schema EBML Schema validation
#292 opened Oct 22, 2019 by dericed
9
Compability between different DocTypeVersions clarifications Improve the readability and comprehension of the specs enhancement Add more content to the document, explaning more things
#221 opened Feb 12, 2019 by mkver
2
add handling of encodings others than binary enhancement Add more content to the document, explaning more things format addition To consider in future EBML versions
#175 opened Jan 26, 2018 by retokromer
3
Add a Rational Number type format addition To consider in future EBML versions
#164 opened Aug 9, 2017 by robUx4 new-rfc
23
define convention for expressing EBML fragments in readable text enhancement Add more content to the document, explaning more things format addition To consider in future EBML versions
#156 opened Jul 14, 2017 by robUx4
ProTip! Find all open issues with in progress development work with linked:pr.