-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
DFR-3334 Judge Approve Orders - approves or changes #1997
base: DFR-3332-Judge-Approve-Orders---starting-page
Are you sure you want to change the base?
DFR-3334 Judge Approve Orders - approves or changes #1997
Conversation
…-3334-Approves-or-Changesv2 # Conflicts: # src/main/java/uk/gov/hmcts/reform/finrem/caseorchestration/handler/judgeapproval/ApproveDraftOrdersAboutToStartHandler.java
…into DFR-3334-Approves-or-Changesv2
…-3334-Approves-or-Changesv2
…-3334-Approves-or-Changesv2
…-3334-Approves-or-Changesv2 # Conflicts: # src/main/java/uk/gov/hmcts/reform/finrem/caseorchestration/model/ccd/draftorders/review/DraftOrderDocumentReview.java
Plan Result (aat)
|
Plan Result (prod)
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
ApproveOrderService has a lot of protected methods but they really seem to be private. So the protected visibility is only there to enable them to be unit tested. This doesn't seem a good approach. If a class is so complex that private methods need to be tested in isolation then that suggests you should refactor your code. It's ok to create small classes. They can be package private if they are only required in judgeapproval.
…-3334-Approves-or-Changesv2
…-3334-Approves-or-Changesv2
…into DFR-3334-Approves-or-Changesv2
…-3334-Approves-or-Changesv2
…-3334-Approves-or-Changesv2
…-3334-Approves-or-Changesv2
Jira link
See DFR-3334
Change description
Testing done
Checklist