-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 405
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
ROS 2 support #69
Comments
Thanks for raising this. Let me quickly state that we currently don't have any specific plans to develop this, but I would be happy to assist in questions raised by anyone going for this. |
First thing to do probably would be to refactor Porting the driver (so not the library) to ROS 2 is complicated right now because of the lack of There is work underway on that as well, but it's not usable right now. |
Based on the comments related to ros_control support limiting ROS2 driver development, has there been any update on adding ROS2 support relative to the UR driver? MR |
I'll leave the details to @fmauch, but at least the refactor into separate library has been done/is in progress. See #266 and UniversalRobots/Universal_Robots_Client_Library. re: |
The library in UniversalRobots/Universal_Robots_Client_Library should be ready to use, so if anyone wants to start building a ROS2 driver ontop of that, this should be working. The dev team from this driver currently still doesn't have any plans further following this. |
@fmauch Understand that currently you do not have plans to develop ROS2 drivers. In the long term, is ROS2 support on your roadmap? We are currently looking at productionizing couple of robot (UR10e) cells at our company and ROS2 support is critical. (Prototype cell is running via ROS bridge). Curious to know your long term roadmap for ROS2. Thank you. |
I am also interested to see ros2 driver for UR robots! Do you have any plans to support ROS2 in the future? |
I agree, support for ROS2 will be very valuable, so I'm also interested on the roadmap for ROS2 |
Yes, as there are more and more ROS2 users, support for ROS2 is definitely worth consideration. |
Being that there seems to be interest, and within the ROS-Industrial Consortium Americas we have membership engagement on this topic, what would it take @fmauch to get it on the UR/FZI roadmap? |
+1 to a ROS 2 driver, PickNik's UR5 badly needs one to support development of the MoveIt 2 project! |
Yes, please support ROS 2! |
ROS2 integration will be a must. Many of our collaborators are seeing ROS2 as a necessary upgrade to move systems from the lab to the field for a variety of good reasons. |
Maybe @stefanscherzinger can drop a word about this once there are any news? |
ROS 2 support would be much appreciated. |
+1 from me too! My group at SwRI is using a few UR-10e's in industrial applications where most of the rest of the system consists of ROS2 nodes. Right now we use the |
Another vote for ROS 2 support. We use UR5e and UR7e in production. |
With ros2_control and moveit2 upcoming, a native ROS 2 UR driver would be very cool. So +1. |
One more vote for ROS 2 Support! We have almost 7 UR10 robots planned for use this year in production. Can you please share with us your development timeline? Right now we are still using the urx driver, but we need to switch to the more powerful UR ROS driver in the next few months. Your timeline would be very helpful for us to decide if we wait for ROS2 support, or directly start using the outgoing UR ROS driver. Thanks! |
Work is on its way currently. @AndyZe can probably say more about this atm. |
Indeed. You can keep an eye on the repo here. It's not ready for public use yet, though. My rough guess is 2 months for a beta release. |
Update: the driver is ready for beta testers, announcement here, but still plenty of work to be done. |
Closing this as the driver for ROS2 has been released since quite a while. |
Opening this issue to track progress. Follow up on ros-industrial-attic/ur_modern_driver#244
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: