Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

16.1.1 #324

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from
Closed

16.1.1 #324

wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

github-actions[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

This is the release candidate for version 16.1.1.

github-actions and others added 2 commits May 30, 2024 10:07
@legobeat legobeat marked this pull request as ready for review May 30, 2024 10:46
@legobeat legobeat requested a review from a team as a code owner May 30, 2024 10:46
Comment on lines +18 to +19
- Change webextension-polyfill from dependency to peerDependency ([#319](https://github.com/MetaMask/providers/pull/319))
- Users are now expected to have the polyfill in their environment
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This could technically be seen as breaking change, since you now have to install an extra dependency? Not sure if we should major bump though.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I was going a bit back and forth on it. I think in this specific case, it can kind of be assumed?

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@metamask/providers is used outside of an extension context in some places like Snaps, so I'm not sure we can or should assume the polyfill is installed. 🤔 Is it a required dependency? Can we make it an optional peer dependency instead?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hmm, considering that, might as well play it conservative and go for major, I guess. Reopening.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@legobeat legobeat closed this May 30, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants