Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fixes and cleanup for bibchecker #54

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Nov 8, 2021

Conversation

paxtonfitzpatrick
Copy link
Member

List of citation keys added (one per line)

  • no citation keys added

List of citation keys modified (one per line)

  • LeeEtal13 (American -> {American})
  • BraiFree97 (A -> {A}, Bayesian -> {Bayesian})
  • CoppEtal17 (changed from article to inproceedings, add/remove appropriate fields, etc.)
  • CartEtal16 (set force = {True})
  • also removed date-added and date-modified fields from all entries

Other changes (describe)

  • add "EMBS" and "BHI" to caps.txt

Copy link
Member

@jeremymanning jeremymanning left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@paxtonfitzpatrick this looks great! can you check the comment i added to verify that it's correct? it looks like the parentheses/curly braces don't quite match, but i'm not sure if it's a hack to get the checker to pass that entry

date-modified = {2021-10-26 21:34:02 -0400},
journal = {{IEEE} {Xplore}},
pages = {doi.org/10.1109/BHI.2017.7897288},
booktitle = {2017 {IEEE} {EMBS} International Conference on Biomedical \& Health Informatics {(BHI})},
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

is the {(BHI}) part correct?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

it's "correct" in that it passses the checker -- I opened #53 about this.

I agree that I'd expect it to be ({BHI}) instead, and the checker should probably be fixed to accept this, but since the difference shouldn't actually affect the output, I went ahead and formatted as the checker wanted for now.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍

@jeremymanning jeremymanning merged commit bb735e4 into ContextLab:master Nov 8, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants