Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

soc: nordic: nrf53: SOC_NRF53_CPUNET_ENABLE should not depend on !BT #79875

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

sean-madigan
Copy link
Contributor

This causes issues as we still want the net core to be set up on initialisation if CONFIG_BT is enabled in many cases.

The previous changes in
#74304 assumed that because this is also handled in
bt_hci_transport_setup that it shouldn't be done on initialisation too.

Also, I think that
bt_hci_transport_setup should not be even controlling the network core state like it is currently and should be looked at being changed in a future PR.

This causes issues as we still want the net core to be set
up on initialisation if CONFIG_BT is enabled in many cases.

The previous changes in
zephyrproject-rtos#74304
assumed that because this is also handled in
`bt_hci_transport_setup` that it shouldn't be done on
initialisation too.

Also, I think that
`bt_hci_transport_setup` should not be even controlling the
network core state like it is currently and should be
looked at being changed in a future PR.

Signed-off-by: Sean Madigan <[email protected]>
sean-madigan added a commit to sean-madigan/sdk-zephyr that referenced this pull request Oct 15, 2024
… depend on !BT

This causes issues as we still want the net core to be set
up on initialisation if CONFIG_BT is enabled in many cases.

The previous changes in
zephyrproject-rtos/zephyr#74304
assumed that because this is also handled in
`bt_hci_transport_setup` that it shouldn't be done on
initialisation too.

Also, I think that
`bt_hci_transport_setup` should not be even controlling the
network core state like it is currently and should be
looked at being changed in a future PR.

Upstream PR: zephyrproject-rtos/zephyr#79875

Signed-off-by: Sean Madigan <[email protected]>
@cvinayak
Copy link
Contributor

Also, I think that
bt_hci_transport_setup should not be even controlling the network core state like it is currently and should be looked at being changed in a future PR.

Please create a GH issue to follow up, so that this request is not lost in the future... or do you already have PR you can link here?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
platform: nRF Nordic nRFx
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants