Fix Bircom messages #310
Fix Bircom messages #310
Conversation
Correctly look for the last known position
Reviewer's Guide by SourceryThis pull request fixes an issue with Bircom messages by correctly looking for the last known position. The changes involve updating the test case and the main implementation to use the most recent position data instead of the first one. File-Level Changes
Tips
|
WalkthroughThe changes involve updates to the test cases for the Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant Test as Test Suite
participant Parser as parse function
participant Data as Data Structure
Test->>Data: Initialize test data with new values
Test->>Parser: Call parse with updated data
Parser->>Parser: Calculate lastFixAgeSec using last element of timeSec
Parser-->>Test: Return parsed results
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![sourcery-ai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/48477?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Hey @vicb - I've reviewed your changes and they look great!
Here's what I looked at during the review
- 🟢 General issues: all looks good
- 🟢 Security: all looks good
- 🟢 Testing: all looks good
- 🟢 Complexity: all looks good
- 🟢 Documentation: all looks good
Help me be more useful! Please click 👍 or 👎 on each comment to tell me if it was helpful.
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (2)
- apps/fetcher/src/app/trackers/meshbir.test.ts (3 hunks)
- apps/fetcher/src/app/trackers/meshbir.ts (1 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (5)
apps/fetcher/src/app/trackers/meshbir.ts (2)
129-129: Approve the change inlastFixAgeSeccalculation.The change to use the last element of the
track.timeSecarray for calculatinglastFixAgeSecis approved as it aligns with the PR's objective to correct the method of locating the last known position.However, verify the impact of this change on the system, especially in scenarios where the timing of events is critical.
Verification successful
Verification of
lastFixAgeSecCalculation ChangeThe change in the calculation of
lastFixAgeSecinmeshbir.tsis consistent with similar logic found in other tracker files. This suggests that the change is appropriate and should function correctly within the system. The use oflastFixAgeSecin conditional logic to handle event timing is consistent across the codebase.
meshbir.ts: UseslastFixAgeSecto decide whether to continue processing or push points.- Other files (
skylines.ts,spot.ts,inreach.ts,flymaster.ts) use similar logic for event timing.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the impact of the change in `lastFixAgeSec` calculation on the system. # Test: Search for the usage of `lastFixAgeSec` in the system. Expect: Correct handling of event timing. rg --type typescript -A 5 $'lastFixAgeSec'Length of output: 76
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the impact of the change in `lastFixAgeSec` calculation on the system. # Test: Search for the usage of `lastFixAgeSec` in TypeScript files. Expect: Correct handling of event timing. rg --type ts -A 5 $'lastFixAgeSec'Length of output: 3601
Line range hint
15-57: Verify integration of theparsefunction within the class.Ensure that the changes in the
parsefunction are correctly integrated and used within theMeshBirFetcherclass methods.Verification successful
Integration of
parsefunction is verified and correct.The
parsefunction is correctly integrated within thefetchmethod of theMeshBirFetcherclass. It processes messages and maps them to datastore IDs as intended. No issues were found with this integration.
- The
parsefunction is defined and used inapps/fetcher/src/app/trackers/meshbir.ts.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of the `parse` function within the `MeshBirFetcher` class. # Test: Search for the `parse` function usage within the class. Expect: Correct integration. ast-grep --lang typescript --pattern $'class MeshBirFetcher { $$$ parse($_, $_, $_, $_) { $$$ } $$$ }'Length of output: 117
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Locate the definition of the `parse` function in the codebase. ast-grep --lang typescript --pattern 'function parse($_, $_, $_, $_) { $$$ }'Length of output: 81
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Verify the usage of the `parse` function in the `fetch` method of the `MeshBirFetcher` class. rg 'parse\(' -A 5 --context-separator='' --no-headingLength of output: 38855
apps/fetcher/src/app/trackers/meshbir.test.ts (3)
289-289: Approved use ofjest.useFakeTimerswith new timestamp.The adjustment to the fake timer's timestamp is appropriate for testing the new logic under different timing conditions.
294-294: Review changes to test data and expected output.The test data and the structure of the
protos.Pilot.createcall have been significantly altered to include arrays of values instead of single values. This change allows for more comprehensive testing of theparsefunction's ability to handle multiple data points.The expected output has also been updated to reflect the last known position accurately, which is crucial for verifying the correctness of the
parsefunction under the new logic.Also applies to: 305-308, 318-323
Line range hint
289-323: Verify robustness of test case.Given the significant changes to the test setup and expected outcomes, it's crucial to ensure that these tests cover all relevant scenarios, including edge cases where the message might be slightly older or newer than the positions.
Consider adding additional assertions or test cases to cover edge scenarios where timing differences are minimal to ensure the
parsefunction behaves as expected.
Correctly look for the last known position
Summary by Sourcery
Fix the message association logic to correctly use the last known position by referencing the most recent timestamp in the track data, and update the corresponding test cases to validate this behavior.
Bug Fixes:
Tests:
Summary by CodeRabbit
Bug Fixes
Tests