Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore(deps): update pozil/auto-assign-issue action to v2 #252

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

renovate[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@renovate renovate bot commented May 14, 2024

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Type Update Change
pozil/auto-assign-issue action major v1.12.0 -> v2.0.1

Release Notes

pozil/auto-assign-issue (pozil/auto-assign-issue)

v2.0.1: - Bump dependencies

Compare Source

  • build: bump dependencies
  • feat: extra test for random PR reviewer

v2.0.0: - Node 20 support

Compare Source

  • feat: switch to node@20

v1.14.0: - Random assignments with weights

Compare Source

  • feat: support for weights in random assignments (addresses #​120)
  • build: bumped dependencies

v1.13.0: - Add team as PR reviewer

Compare Source

  • feat: new parameter to add a team as PR reviewer. Thanks to @​johmara
  • build: bumped dependencies (requires node 18+)

Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - At any time (no schedule defined), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR was generated by Mend Renovate. View the repository job log.

@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/pozil-auto-assign-issue-2.x branch from 9fb1185 to 26f3d97 Compare November 19, 2024 23:19
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

0 participants