Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Everflow - Test for recircle port queue counter #16018

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

sanjair-git
Copy link
Contributor

Description of PR

Summary:

  • A new test case has been added to make sure mirrored packets are sent on the recircle port via the specific queue configured under mirror session config.

Type of change

  • Bug fix
  • Testbed and Framework(new/improvement)
  • Test case(new/improvement)

Back port request

  • 202012
  • 202205
  • 202305
  • 202311
  • 202405

Approach

What is the motivation for this PR?

  • To make sure specific queue configuration under mirror session config is verified.
  • And to make sure the mirrored packets are sent on the recircle port via the specific queue configured.

How did you do it?

  • Added a new test case to verify mirrored packets are sent via the specific queue configured under mirror session config.

How did you verify/test it?

  • Ran the test on T2 VOQ chassis and made sure the tests are passing.

Any platform specific information?

Supported testbed topology if it's a new test case?

Documentation

image

@mssonicbld
Copy link
Collaborator

/azp run

Copy link

Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

@mssonicbld
Copy link
Collaborator

/azp run

Copy link

Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

flake8 fixes

Skip everflow recircle_port_queue test for non broadcom-dnx platforms

conditional-mark sorting fix
@mssonicbld
Copy link
Collaborator

/azp run

Copy link

Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants