Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

update list with current, known instances in the wild, added 7 URLs #888

Merged
merged 10 commits into from
Jun 11, 2024
Merged

update list with current, known instances in the wild, added 7 URLs #888

merged 10 commits into from
Jun 11, 2024

Conversation

ewingson
Copy link
Member

@ewingson ewingson commented May 9, 2024

d2024-05-09 t20:53

doing this crosschecked with @csarven, @bourgeoa or maintainers, please review and merge

foreseeable the added providers are persistent enough

hope that helps

d2024-05-09 t20:53

doing this crosschecked with @csarven, @bourgeoa or maintainers, please review and merge

foreseeable the added providers are persistent enough
Copy link
Member

@csarven csarven left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Couple of things. Not sure about the correctness of some of this information, e.g., the software that's being used. Is that based on public information or informed by the provider? Some of the services require paid sign-ups, so can't tell.

Generally, we should aim to have the consent of the provider to be listed in this table. Or at least inform them that they are being listed so that they can have a chance to correct this information.

pages/use-solid.md Show resolved Hide resolved
pages/use-solid.md Show resolved Hide resolved
pages/use-solid.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
pages/use-solid.md Show resolved Hide resolved
pages/use-solid.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
pages/use-solid.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
pages/use-solid.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
d2024-05-18 t06:59

- I have left Inrupt Pod spaces in the list, because in the current state, it already is also in there.
- I have updated the startpage of solidweb.org with a comment about enabled/disabled corsProxy.
- I have linked to the correct terms and conditions of the european Trinpod service.
- I have deleted the KIT page, because registration is disabled.
- I have deleted the OpenLink servers, because the server seems no original NSS and the versions seem deprecated (v4 and v5)
----
the KMI Open University site has no impressum, so I'm not sure how to inform them that we added their instance.
@ewingson
Copy link
Member Author

ewingson commented May 18, 2024

I have edited precisely.
though, not sure, how to use the github resolve conversation feature

d2024-05-18 t07:38

corrected trinpod US hosting company, as suggested by Fred (owner)
d2024-05-18 t07:44
Copy link
Member Author

@ewingson ewingson left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

how do we find consensus ?
+1 for keeping it in the list...

pages/use-solid.md Show resolved Hide resolved
@TallTed
Copy link
Contributor

TallTed commented May 31, 2024

@ewingson — in b98072b, you said --

- I have deleted the OpenLink servers, because the server seems no original 
  NSS and the versions seem deprecated (v4 and v5)

I need to understand what the above means.

  • "the server seems no original NSS" is not English.
  • "the versions seem deprecated (v4 and v5)" suggests that the list is only meant to include specific version(s) of something, but I don't see anything that says what those versions are.

To my mind, "current, known instances in the wild" should include any version of any implementation. That should include those two OpenLink-hosted instances, which are running OpenLink forks of NSS.

/cc @kidehen @openlink

@ewingson
Copy link
Member Author

ewingson commented May 31, 2024

@TallTed

Sarven mentioned

Seems like it is NSS with some OpenLink customisations? If that's a different software than NSS, it is better to link to that instead of NSS.

if it is a minor concern, that the two servers are running Solid 4.4.2 and 5.0.1 (which seem at least originated in Node Solid Server) we can of course again include them in the list (which then would (positively) be more inclusive).

let's look what Kingsley can contribute...

d2024-05-31 t18:03
@kidehen
Copy link

kidehen commented May 31, 2024

Those are instances that work, and based on what @TallTed has already stated. You should only be concerned if they aren't working, otherwise, they are usable solid servers etc..

@ewingson
Copy link
Member Author

ewingson commented Jun 1, 2024

@kidehen @csarven @TallTed @melvincarvalho @michielbdejong @-maintainers-

Thank you. I have added them.

pages/use-solid.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
d2024-06-04 t03:45

yes. makes sense. thx.
@michielbdejong michielbdejong merged commit 8732bd2 into solid:main Jun 11, 2024
3 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants