Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

relax orderly-set dependency #486

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Sep 29, 2024
Merged

Conversation

dimbleby
Copy link

an exact requirement is just inviting conflicts with other projects

I see that orderly-set is also your project - so if you intend to release breaking changes more or less often than you change the major version number, please do adjust (or remove) the upper bound as appropriate

@VBobCat VBobCat mentioned this pull request Sep 27, 2024
@seperman seperman changed the base branch from master to dev September 29, 2024 06:57
Copy link

codecov bot commented Sep 29, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 96.55%. Comparing base (a114ed2) to head (ae50b1c).
Report is 3 commits behind head on dev.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##              dev     #486   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   96.55%   96.55%           
=======================================
  Files          14       14           
  Lines        3946     3946           
=======================================
  Hits         3810     3810           
  Misses        136      136           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@seperman
Copy link
Owner

@dimbleby Thanks for making the PR!

@seperman seperman merged commit 111a2eb into seperman:dev Sep 29, 2024
7 checks passed
@dimbleby dimbleby deleted the relax-requirement branch September 29, 2024 08:12
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants