Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

rewrite capacity scrape into a jobloop.ProducerConsumerJob #355

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Sep 12, 2023

Conversation

majewsky
Copy link
Contributor

This allows each capacitor to run individually, and fail individually, without blocking the other capacitors from running.

This allows each capacitor to run individually, and fail individually,
without blocking the other capacitors from running.
@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Sep 12, 2023

Coverage Status

coverage: 80.079% (+0.1%) from 79.933% when pulling a73e2db on capacity-jobloop into 5d77aa8 on master.

I'm retroactively editing an existing migration because this is only
rolled out on QA so far and thus easy to fix.
internal/collector/capacity_scrape_test.go Show resolved Hide resolved
internal/collector/capacity_scrape_test.go Show resolved Hide resolved
internal/collector/capacity_scrape.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
internal/collector/capacity_scrape.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@SuperSandro2000 SuperSandro2000 merged commit 8774ef5 into master Sep 12, 2023
6 checks passed
@SuperSandro2000 SuperSandro2000 deleted the capacity-jobloop branch September 12, 2023 13:32
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants