[ESP8266]Moving Inline Fuction to its own header #83
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
…ols not beeing found
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This should fix compilation for ESP8266 controllers
The inline function should not increase size if done like this.
other wierd thing i found is naming of headers...
had use absolute path for header since ESP8266 already creates a Crypto.h
#include "D:\...\Arduino\libraries\Crypto\src\Crypto.h"feel free to rename the Inlines.h since thats probably also a name that someone might use...
please check compatibility before merging dont want to interupt work if i accidently broke something