Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix typos #134823

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Dec 28, 2024
Merged

Fix typos #134823

merged 2 commits into from
Dec 28, 2024

Conversation

chloefeal
Copy link
Contributor

This PR focuses on correcting typos and improving clarity in documentation files. Thank you.

Signed-off-by: chloefeal <[email protected]>
@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Dec 27, 2024

Thanks for the pull request, and welcome! The Rust team is excited to review your changes, and you should hear from @Mark-Simulacrum (or someone else) some time within the next two weeks.

Please see the contribution instructions for more information. Namely, in order to ensure the minimum review times lag, PR authors and assigned reviewers should ensure that the review label (S-waiting-on-review and S-waiting-on-author) stays updated, invoking these commands when appropriate:

  • @rustbot author: the review is finished, PR author should check the comments and take action accordingly
  • @rustbot review: the author is ready for a review, this PR will be queued again in the reviewer's queue

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Dec 27, 2024
@tgross35
Copy link
Contributor

@bors r+ rollup

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Dec 27, 2024

📌 Commit e1b65be has been approved by tgross35

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Dec 27, 2024
@tgross35 tgross35 assigned tgross35 and unassigned Mark-Simulacrum Dec 27, 2024
matthiaskrgr added a commit to matthiaskrgr/rust that referenced this pull request Dec 28, 2024
Fix typos

This PR focuses on correcting typos and improving clarity in documentation files. Thank you.
@dtolnay
Copy link
Member

dtolnay commented Dec 28, 2024

Thanks!

@bors r=tgross35,dtolnay

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Dec 28, 2024

📌 Commit bc05424 has been approved by tgross35,dtolnay

It is now in the queue for this repository.

bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Dec 28, 2024
Rollup of 4 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#134823 (Fix typos)
 - rust-lang#134827 (Some random region tweaks)
 - rust-lang#134833 (Skip parenthesis if `.` makes statement boundary unambiguous)
 - rust-lang#134834 (Skip parenthesis around tuple struct field calls)

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit 9aebd28 into rust-lang:master Dec 28, 2024
6 checks passed
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.85.0 milestone Dec 28, 2024
rust-timer added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Dec 28, 2024
Rollup merge of rust-lang#134823 - chloefeal:fix, r=tgross35,dtolnay

Fix typos

This PR focuses on correcting typos and improving clarity in documentation files. Thank you.
@chloefeal chloefeal deleted the fix branch December 28, 2024 07:24
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants