-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 16
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Minpack rewrite #8
Conversation
Use other parametrization for normal. The derivatives were wrong after normalization.
This is likely to cause wrong derivatives. If you want constrained optimization use a different algorithm or parametrization.
I will now work on removing the restriction n <= m (number of residuals can not be less than number of parameters). But this restriction does not block a release. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Awesome! You have done an immense amount of work, and I appreciate it so much. This is one of the most important algorithms for us to have.
Any of the changes in the review I can implement and set up a PR to your branch. I would just like your feedback on whether these are good ideas.
9dd4109
to
9321a13
Compare
Ok, I adressed the review comments. Only the change of |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Alright, everything has been addressed. I will go ahead and merge! 🎉
I will release the new version soon. |
Closes #2, #3, #4 and #6.
I am quite confident that the implementation is correct now.