Dynamic compose/haven #6113
Dynamic compose/haven #6113
Conversation
|
Thank you for your contribution! Unfortunately, we are no longer accepting pull requests from external collaborators due to the high volume of PRs we have to deal with daily. We have reached a point in which it has become too complicated to validate, test and maintain this huge amount of apps resulting in a poor experience for our users. We are working at the moment to implement a new feature to allow you to add multiple app stores to your Runtipi instance, so you can add your own apps without the need to send a PR to our repository. This feature will be available very soon, so stay tuned! In the mean time, if you really need your app in Runtipi, you can add your own repository to your Runtipi instance relevant docs |
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces configuration updates for the Haven application. A new Docker Compose configuration file has been added to define the application and database services. The configuration file Changes
Sequence DiagramsequenceDiagram
participant App as Haven Application
participant DB as PostgreSQL Database
App->>DB: Establish Connection
DB-->>App: Connection Established
App->>App: Load Dynamic Configuration
App->>DB: Initialize Database
DB-->>App: Database Ready
App->>App: Start Service on Port 3000
The sequence diagram illustrates the initialization process of the Haven application, showing how it connects to the PostgreSQL database, loads dynamic configuration, and starts the service. Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 3
🔭 Outside diff range comments (1)
apps/haven/config.json (1)
Based on the search results and analysis of the Haven configuration, I can now provide the final response:
Security improvements needed for Haven form fields
The current implementation lacks essential security controls for password and sensitive data handling. Required changes:
For the random DB password field:
- Increase minimum length to 32 characters (currently only specified as "min": 32)
- Add character class requirements (uppercase, lowercase, numbers, special characters)
- Use a cryptographically secure random generator
For the user password field:
- Add password complexity requirements (minimum length, character classes)
- Add input validation to prevent common weak passwords
- Consider implementing password strength indicators
For the email field:
- Add proper email format validation
- Consider implementing disposable email address filtering
General security:
- Implement rate limiting for failed login attempts
- Add server-side validation for all inputs
- Consider adding CAPTCHA for repeated failed attempts
🔗 Analysis chain
Line range hint
18-37: Review security considerations for form fieldsThe form fields handle sensitive data (email, passwords). Please ensure:
- The password field uses secure random generation with sufficient entropy
- Database password is properly isolated from user password
Consider adding:
- Password complexity requirements
- Rate limiting for failed attempts
- Input validation for email format
Let me gather more information about the security configurations and form field validations in the codebase.
These scripts will help us verify:
- Existing password validation and complexity requirements
- Rate limiting implementations
- Email validation patterns
- Security configurations
- Password generation logic
Let me analyze the results to provide a comprehensive verification of the security considerations.
Let me search specifically for password generation and validation implementations in the Haven app.
These scripts will help us verify the specific security implementations in the Haven app, particularly around password generation, validation, and rate limiting.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Error: No shell scripts found
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for password-related configurations and validations rg -i "password.*validation|password.*requirement|password.*complexity" -A 3 # Search for rate limiting implementations rg -i "rate.*limit|throttle|brute.*force" -A 3 # Look for email validation patterns rg -i "email.*validation|email.*format|email.*pattern" -A 3 # Search for security-related configurations fd -e json -e yaml -e yml | xargs rg -i "security|authentication|auth.*config" # Check for any existing password generation logic ast-grep --pattern 'function $FUNC($$$) { $$$ password $$$ $$$ }'Length of output: 12641
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for password-related code in Haven app fd -t f -e js -e ts -e json haven | xargs rg -i "password.*generate|password.*random|password.*validate" # Look for any security configurations in Haven fd -t f haven | xargs rg -i "security|auth.*config|password.*config" # Search for form validation logic ast-grep --pattern 'function $FUNC($$$) { $$$ validate($$$) { $$$ } $$$ }' # Check for any rate limiting implementations in Haven fd -t f haven | xargs rg -i "rate.*limit|throttle|max.*attempts"Length of output: 24323
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
apps/haven/config.json(2 hunks)apps/haven/docker-compose.json(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (3)
apps/haven/config.json (2)
6-6: LGTM: Dynamic configuration enabled
The addition of "dynamic_config": true aligns with the PR objective to implement dynamic compose functionality.
9-9: Verify compatibility with Tipi version 4
The increment of tipi_version to 4 might have compatibility implications.
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more information about the Tipi versioning to better understand the compatibility implications.
Let me check the schema definition to understand the tipi versioning requirements.
Based on the analysis of the codebase, I can now provide a final response:
Tipi version 4 is compatible and widely used
The version increment to 4 is safe as many other apps in the repository are already using tipi_version 4 or higher. The schema only requires it to be an integer value, and there are numerous examples of apps successfully using version 4, including odoo, owncast, librespeed, and others.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for version-specific features or breaking changes
rg -l "tipi_version.*4" --type json
Length of output: 1186
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for any documentation or schema files that might define version requirements
fd -e md -e yaml -e json "schema|version|CHANGELOG|README" -x rg -l "tipi.*version"
# Look for any version-specific code or configurations
rg "tipi.*version" -A 3 -B 3 --type json
Length of output: 85573
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the schema definition for tipi_version
cat apps/schema.json | jq '.properties.tipi_version'
# Look for any documentation about version compatibility
fd -e md -x rg -l "tipi.*version"
Length of output: 112
apps/haven/docker-compose.json (1)
8-16:
Security concern: Database authentication configuration
Several security considerations need attention:
- Environment variables are properly referenced using ${} syntax
- However, POSTGRES_HOST_AUTH_METHOD is set to "trust" in the database service, which bypasses password authentication
Consider implementing:
- "POSTGRES_HOST_AUTH_METHOD": "trust",
+ "POSTGRES_PASSWORD": "${HAVEN_DB_PASSWORD}",Likely invalid or redundant comment.
Dynamic compose for haven
This is a haven update for using dynamic compose. (no other change)
Situation tested :
Reaching the app :
In app tests :
Volumes mapping verified :
Specific instructions verified :
Summary by CodeRabbit
havenandhaven-db, including environment settings and persistent storage configurations.