-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 280
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add dynamic compose for halo #6095
Add dynamic compose for halo #6095
Conversation
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces configuration updates for the Halo application. A new Docker Compose configuration file has been added to define services for the Halo application and its PostgreSQL database. The Halo application's configuration file has been modified to enable dynamic configuration, update the Tipi framework version, and refresh the timestamp. The changes set up a containerized deployment with specific service configurations, including health checks and volume mounting for data persistence. Changes
Sequence DiagramsequenceDiagram
participant App as Halo Application
participant DB as PostgreSQL Database
App->>DB: Initialize Database Connection
DB-->>App: Confirm Database Ready
App->>App: Start Application
App->>App: Perform Health Check
App-->>App: Confirm Application Readiness
The sequence diagram illustrates the initialization process of the Halo application and its database service, showing the health check and readiness confirmation steps. Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
Thank you for your contribution! Unfortunately, we are no longer accepting pull requests from external collaborators due to the high volume of PRs we have to deal with daily. We have reached a point in which it has become too complicated to validate, test and maintain this huge amount of apps resulting in a poor experience for our users. We are working at the moment to implement a new feature to allow you to add multiple app stores to your Runtipi instance, so you can add your own apps without the need to send a PR to our repository. This feature will be available very soon, so stay tuned! In the mean time, if you really need your app in Runtipi, you can add your own repository to your Runtipi instance relevant docs |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
apps/halo/docker-compose.json (2)
26-32
: Consider adjusting health check parametersThe current health check configuration might be too lenient:
- 30s interval could delay failure detection
- 5 retries with 5s timeout means up to 25s before failing
"healthCheck": { - "interval": "30s", + "interval": "15s", "timeout": "5s", - "retries": 5, + "retries": 3, "startPeriod": "30s", "test": "curl -f http://localhost:8090/actuator/health/readiness" }
49-54
: Enhance PostgreSQL health checkThe current PostgreSQL health check only verifies if the server is accepting connections. Consider adding checks for:
- Database existence
- User permissions
"healthCheck": { "interval": "10s", "timeout": "5s", "retries": 5, - "test": "pg_isready" + "test": ["CMD-SHELL", "pg_isready && psql -U halo -d halo -c 'SELECT 1'"] }
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
apps/halo/config.json
(2 hunks)apps/halo/docker-compose.json
(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (5)
apps/halo/config.json (2)
6-6
: LGTM: Dynamic configuration enabled
The addition of "dynamic_config": true
aligns with the PR objective to implement dynamic compose functionality for the Halo application.
9-9
: Verify framework compatibility with version 40
The Tipi framework version has been bumped from 39 to 40. Please ensure that all features required by the dynamic compose implementation are supported in this version.
Also applies to: 32-32
✅ Verification successful
Let me search for more information about Tipi version requirements and compatibility.
Let me try one more search to find any documentation about version requirements or compatibility.
Based on the search results, I can see that Tipi version 40 is well within the normal range of version numbers used across the apps in the repository, with many apps using both lower and higher version numbers (ranging from 1 to 395). There's no indication of any breaking changes or specific version requirements that would affect the dynamic compose implementation. Additionally, looking at other apps with similar functionality, they work fine with comparable or even lower Tipi versions.
Version 40 is compatible with the framework
The version bump from 39 to 40 appears to be a routine update, and there's no evidence of compatibility issues with dynamic compose functionality in the codebase.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check if there are any breaking changes or specific requirements for tipi_version 40
rg -A 5 "tipi_version.*40"
Length of output: 418
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for Tipi version related documentation or requirements
rg -i "tipi.*version|version.*tipi" -g "!*.{json,lock}" -A 3
# Look for any dynamic compose related files or documentation
fd -e md -e txt | xargs rg -i "dynamic.*compose"
# Search for changelog or version history
fd -g "*CHANGELOG*" -g "*HISTORY*" -g "*UPGRADE*" -g "*MIGRATION*" -t f
Length of output: 1296
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for documentation about version requirements
fd -e md | xargs rg -i "version.*requirement|minimum.*version|compatible.*version"
# Check if there are any previous versions in config files
rg -g "*.json" "tipi_version.*[0-9]+" -B 2 -A 2
# Look for any compose or configuration related files
fd -e yaml -e yml | xargs rg -i "compose|configuration" -A 3
Length of output: 69841
apps/halo/docker-compose.json (3)
19-25
: LGTM: Secure configuration parameters
The Spring configuration parameters are properly set using environment variables for sensitive data like database credentials. The external URL configuration allows for flexible deployment scenarios.
8-12
: LGTM: Proper service dependency configuration
The dependency configuration ensures that the Halo application only starts after the database is healthy, which is essential for proper initialization.
13-18
: Verify volume permissions and backup strategy
The volume mappings align with the PR objectives, but consider:
- Ensure proper permissions are set for both the app data and PostgreSQL data directories
- Document backup procedures for these persistent volumes
Also applies to: 43-48
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more information about volume permissions and backup documentation specific to the Halo application.
Based on the review of the codebase and configuration files, I can now provide a final response:
Volume permissions and backup considerations are adequately handled
-
The volume mappings follow standard Docker practices:
- App data directory is mounted at
/root/.halo2
with default root user permissions which is appropriate for the Halo application - PostgreSQL data directory uses the official postgres image's defaults which automatically sets correct permissions
- App data directory is mounted at
-
Backup considerations:
- The PostgreSQL data is properly isolated in
${APP_DATA_DIR}/db
- The Halo application data is stored in the root of
${APP_DATA_DIR}
- Both volumes use standard paths that can be easily included in system-wide backup routines
- The PostgreSQL data is properly isolated in
No additional configuration is required as the setup follows best practices for both permissions and backup-friendly structure.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for any existing documentation about volume management
fd -t f -e md -e txt | xargs rg -i "backup|volume|persistence"
Length of output: 16307
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for Halo-specific documentation about volumes and data management
fd -t f "halo" | xargs rg -i "volume|data.*dir|backup|persist"
# Check the app's documentation files
fd -t f -e md -e txt -p "apps/halo" | xargs cat
# Check for any volume-related configuration or scripts
fd -t f "docker-compose|config" -p "apps/halo" | xargs cat
Length of output: 104618
Dynamic compose for halo
This is a halo update for using dynamic compose. (no other change)
Situation tested :
Reaching the app :
In app tests :
Volumes mapping verified :
Specific instructions verified :
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Updates