Add dynamic compose for code-server #6091
Conversation
|
Thank you for your contribution! Unfortunately, we are no longer accepting pull requests from external collaborators due to the high volume of PRs we have to deal with daily. We have reached a point in which it has become too complicated to validate, test and maintain this huge amount of apps resulting in a poor experience for our users. We are working at the moment to implement a new feature to allow you to add multiple app stores to your Runtipi instance, so you can add your own apps without the need to send a PR to our repository. This feature will be available very soon, so stay tuned! In the mean time, if you really need your app in Runtipi, you can add your own repository to your Runtipi instance relevant docs |
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces configuration updates for the Code Server application. A new Docker Compose configuration file has been added to define the Code Server service, specifying its Docker image, environment variables, and volume mappings. The existing configuration JSON file has been updated with a new dynamic configuration flag, an incremented version number, and an updated timestamp. Changes
Sequence DiagramsequenceDiagram
participant User
participant CodeServer
participant DockerCompose
participant HostSystem
DockerCompose->>CodeServer: Deploy service with configuration
CodeServer->>HostSystem: Mount volumes
CodeServer-->>User: Provide access via port 8443
User->>CodeServer: Connect with configured credentials
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
apps/code-server/docker-compose.json (2)
9-10: Consider making PUID/PGID configurable.Instead of hardcoding user/group IDs, consider making them configurable through environment variables for better flexibility across different environments.
- "PUID": "1000", - "PGID": "1000", + "PUID": "${PUID:-1000}", + "PGID": "${PGID:-1000}",
1-36: Consider adding security-related container configurations.While the basic configuration is correct, consider enhancing security with:
- Read-only root filesystem
- Non-root user enforcement
- Memory and CPU limits
- Security opt configurations
"name": "code-server", "image": "lscr.io/linuxserver/code-server:4.96.2", "isMain": true, "internalPort": 8443, + "readOnlyRootFilesystem": true, + "memory": "2g", + "cpus": "1.0", + "securityOpt": ["no-new-privileges:true"],
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
apps/code-server/config.json(2 hunks)apps/code-server/docker-compose.json(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (4)
apps/code-server/config.json (1)
6-6: LGTM! Changes align with dynamic compose implementation.
The configuration changes appropriately support the dynamic compose functionality:
- Added
dynamic_configflag - Incremented
tipi_version - Updated timestamp
Also applies to: 9-9, 36-36
apps/code-server/docker-compose.json (3)
4-7: LGTM! Service configuration is properly defined.
The service configuration correctly specifies:
- Image with pinned version
- Internal port mapping
- Main service designation
16-32: LGTM! Volume mappings match requirements.
The volume mappings correctly implement all required paths as specified in the PR objectives:
- /config for configuration data
- /projects for project files
- /runtipi/app-data and /runtipi/user-config for system data
11-14: Verify environment variable handling.
The configuration includes sensitive data (passwords) and configuration values. Let's verify that these environment variables are properly handled in the parent application.
✅ Verification successful
Environment variables are properly configured and validated
The code-server application properly handles the environment variables:
- The variables are defined in both docker-compose.yml and docker-compose.json formats
- The config.json file includes proper validation for password fields with type and max length constraints
- The environment variables are consistently used across configuration files:
- TZ for timezone
- CODESERVER_PASSWORD for main password
- CODESERVER_SUDO_PASSWORD for sudo access
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for proper environment variable handling in the codebase
# Check for password variable usage
rg -l "CODESERVER_PASSWORD|CODESERVER_SUDO_PASSWORD" --type ts --type js
# Check for TZ variable handling
rg -l "TZ" --type ts --type js
Length of output: 105
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a broader search including environment files and docker-related files
# Also search for any password-related environment variable handling patterns
# Search for environment variables in various config files
rg -l "CODESERVER_PASSWORD|SUDO_PASSWORD|TZ" --type-add 'config:*.{env,conf,yaml,yml,json}' -t config
# Look for environment variable handling patterns in the codebase
rg -A 3 "process\.env\." --type ts --type js
# Check for Docker-related files that might handle these variables
fd -e dockerfile -e docker-compose.yml -e docker-compose.yaml
Length of output: 5618
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's examine the code-server specific files more closely
# Check code-server's configuration files
rg -A 5 "PASSWORD|TZ" apps/code-server/
# Look for any documentation or README files in code-server directory
fd README -d 2 apps/code-server/
# Check if there are any environment validation or setup scripts
fd -e sh -e js -e ts apps/code-server/
Length of output: 2310
Dynamic compose for code-server
This is a code-server update for using dynamic compose. (no other change)
Situation tested :
Reaching the app :
In app tests :
Volumes mapping verified :
Specific instructions verified :
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Updates