Replace LibReddit with Redlib #5459
Conversation
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces several modifications across different configuration files for the LibReddit and Redlib applications. The Changes
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI 📒 Files selected for processing (2)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
apps/redlib/docker-compose.yml (1)
15-40: LGTM with a suggestion for environment variable validation.The Traefik configuration is well-structured and follows best practices. However, consider adding environment variable validation to ensure required variables are set.
Add environment variable validation by creating an
.env.examplefile with:APP_DOMAIN=redlib.example.com LOCAL_DOMAIN=local APP_PORT=8080And add validation in a wrapper script:
#!/bin/bash required_vars=("APP_DOMAIN" "LOCAL_DOMAIN" "APP_PORT") for var in "${required_vars[@]}"; do if [ -z "${!var}" ]; then echo "Error: $var is not set" exit 1 fi done
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (2)
apps/libreddit/metadata/logo.jpgis excluded by!**/*.jpgapps/redlib/metadata/logo.jpgis excluded by!**/*.jpg
📒 Files selected for processing (8)
apps/libreddit/config.json(0 hunks)apps/libreddit/docker-compose.arm64.yml(0 hunks)apps/libreddit/docker-compose.yml(0 hunks)apps/libreddit/metadata/description.md(0 hunks)apps/redlib/config.json(1 hunks)apps/redlib/docker-compose.json(1 hunks)apps/redlib/docker-compose.yml(1 hunks)apps/redlib/metadata/description.md(1 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (4)
- apps/libreddit/config.json
- apps/libreddit/docker-compose.arm64.yml
- apps/libreddit/docker-compose.yml
- apps/libreddit/metadata/description.md
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (2)
- apps/redlib/config.json
- apps/redlib/docker-compose.json
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Markdownlint
apps/redlib/metadata/description.md
10-10: null
Link fragments should be valid
(MD051, link-fragments)
🔇 Additional comments (3)
apps/redlib/docker-compose.yml (3)
13-14: LGTM!
Network configuration is correctly set up for the Tipi ecosystem.
1-40: Verify migration path from LibReddit to Redlib.
While the configuration looks correct, please ensure:
- Data migration path is documented (if applicable)
- Breaking changes between LibReddit and Redlib are communicated to users
- Update user documentation to reflect the new service
✅ Verification successful
Migration from LibReddit to Redlib requires minimal user communication
Based on the documentation, Redlib is a direct fork of LibReddit with the same core functionality and no breaking changes:
- No data migration is needed as both are stateless frontends
- Redlib maintains the same privacy-focused features and architecture
- The transition should be transparent to end users
The only recommended action is to update the app listing in README.md to replace the LibReddit entry with Redlib.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for any existing documentation or migration guides
fd -t f -e md -e txt . | xargs grep -l -i "libreddit"
# Check for potential configuration differences
diff <(fd -t f . apps/libreddit/) <(fd -t f . apps/redlib/) || echo "Structural differences found"
Length of output: 441
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check documentation content for migration details
echo "=== README.md content ==="
cat README.md | grep -A 5 -B 5 -i "libreddit"
echo -e "\n=== Description content ==="
cat apps/redlib/metadata/description.md
# Check for any changelog or release notes
echo -e "\n=== Checking for changelog ==="
fd -t f "CHANGELOG|RELEASES|MIGRATION" .
Length of output: 3931
9-12: Verify wget availability in the container.
The health check depends on wget being available in the container. Consider using curl as an alternative, as it's more commonly available in base images.
✅ Verification successful
Since Docker commands are not available in the sandbox environment, let me try a different approach to verify the container configuration and wget availability by examining the Dockerfile or related configuration files.
Let me try one more approach to find any installation or package management related files that might indicate the availability of wget.
Based on the search results, I can see that wget is commonly used in health checks across multiple applications in this repository, including redlib, teddit, tandoor, sftpgo, and others. This suggests it's a standard practice in this ecosystem. However, since we cannot directly verify the container image contents, and the health check configuration is a critical component, I'll generate the final response:
Health check configuration appears to follow established patterns
The wget-based health check is consistent with other applications in this repository that use similar health check configurations. Multiple applications (teddit, tandoor, sftpgo, etc.) successfully use wget for their health checks, suggesting it's a validated approach in this ecosystem.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Pull and inspect the image to verify wget availability
docker pull quay.io/redlib/redlib:latest
docker run --rm quay.io/redlib/redlib:latest which wget || echo "wget not found"
Length of output: 287
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for Dockerfile in the repository
fd Dockerfile
# Also check for any base image references in Dockerfiles
rg -l "FROM" --type dockerfile
# Look for wget installation commands in Dockerfiles
rg -i "wget" --type dockerfile
Length of output: 184
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Look for any package installation or configuration files
fd -e yaml -e yml -e json -e toml -e Dockerfile
# Search for wget mentions in any file
rg -i "wget"
# Check the content of the redlib Dockerfile if it exists
fd -t f "Dockerfile" apps/redlib/
Length of output: 20151
|
Hello @DireMunchkin, this is not the correct way to deprecate an app. You will have to deprecate this one and make a pull request to add the new one. An app can be deprecated by setting the |
|
@steveiliop56 Ah OK, I can do that. |
This reverts commit 3c831df.
|
@steveiliop56 I set LibReddit to deprecated instead of outright removing it and changed the ports so they don't conflict. |
LibReddit has been discontinued, and are encouraging anyone interested to migrate to Redlib instead, see their announcement here.
Summary by CodeRabbit
Release Notes
New Features
Deprecation Notice
Documentation