Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add feature to have a possible joint offset inserted as configuration parameter #59

Open
fjandrad opened this issue Aug 11, 2019 · 2 comments

Comments

@fjandrad
Copy link
Collaborator

The idea is that if for some reason we detect that the fine calibration requires a change, we might be able to use the previous dataset by explicitly applying the same joint offset change in the logged data, so the estimation from wholebodydynamics will be as if the new fine calibration was being used.
It should be easy to implement since we already have a vector that predetermines the joint order we can just mirror that vector and store the offset delta found in the configurations file there

@fjandrad fjandrad self-assigned this Aug 11, 2019
@fjandrad
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Note: this is will surely work for the datasets collected on the pole and for the ones requiring a controller it would depend if the robot is still able to do the required motions with the changed joint offsets.

@fjandrad
Copy link
Collaborator Author

We may use it in the main configuration file only, for no repetition among all experiments we assume the same joint offsets are required for all linked for all experiments belonging to a configuration dataset.

Now we should decide if it goes on the params file or as a parameter to the read experiment function.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant