-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 332
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
target/riscv: pass memory access info in struct, move write_memory pointer #1167
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM (reviewed internally).
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Seems like the tests have failed. @fk-sc please take a look
13ccb02
to
dbfd2fa
Compare
Fixed |
@JanMatCodasip, @MarekVCodasip, could you please take a look? |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Overall I like this idea very much.
I have managed a partial review only and am sending some coding suggestions.
I will come back to finish the review in the next 1-2 days.
c61d424
to
bcf9bab
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I have managed to move forward with the review but haven't reached the end.
I will return to this PR tomorrow.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Overall this change looks fine - thanks.
I have finished my review and do not expect to have any further comments.
d94c888
to
01501b0
Compare
…inter This changes will allow to unite read_memory/write_memory fucntions to one access function (1) Replaced read/write functions arguments with one structure (2) Unified read_memory/write_memory function pointers to be stored in same structure Signed-off-by: Farid Khaydari <[email protected]>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM, thanks.
This changes will allow to unite read_memory/write_memory functions to one access function
(1) Replaced read/write functions arguments with one structure
(2) Unified read_memory/write_memory function pointers to be stored in same structure