-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 97
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Basic support for DataContext={resource: ...} #1392
Open
exyi
wants to merge
10
commits into
main
Choose a base branch
from
resource-datacontext
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
+877
−184
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
exyi
force-pushed
the
resource-datacontext
branch
2 times, most recently
from
May 25, 2022 18:23
bcdd52d
to
e885da2
Compare
exyi
force-pushed
the
resource-datacontext
branch
from
August 2, 2022 18:08
d99fb15
to
dca0a1b
Compare
exyi
force-pushed
the
resource-datacontext
branch
from
August 3, 2022 14:31
a9193f7
to
2fa5063
Compare
exyi
force-pushed
the
resource-datacontext
branch
2 times, most recently
from
September 11, 2022 21:32
efbaf1e
to
3ee2344
Compare
exyi
force-pushed
the
resource-datacontext
branch
from
September 14, 2022 10:37
3ee2344
to
14a7721
Compare
exyi
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 7, 2022
problem was that that BindingHelper.FindDataContextTarget assumed there was one more data context layer since we used set data context type and DataContext on different controls. Because of that command client-side and server-side data context paths didn't match. Technically, this is a glitch of BindingHelper, not HierarchyRepeater, but "fixing" BindingHelper will break many things and it's hopefully going to be done in #1392
exyi
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 7, 2022
problem was that that BindingHelper.FindDataContextTarget assumed there was one more data context layer since we used set data context type and DataContext on different controls. Because of that command client-side and server-side data context paths didn't match. Technically, this is a glitch of BindingHelper, not HierarchyRepeater, but "fixing" BindingHelper will break many things and it's hopefully going to be done in #1392
exyi
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 21, 2022
problem was that that BindingHelper.FindDataContextTarget assumed there was one more data context layer since we used set data context type and DataContext on different controls. Because of that command client-side and server-side data context paths didn't match. Technically, this is a glitch of BindingHelper, not HierarchyRepeater, but "fixing" BindingHelper will break many things and it's hopefully going to be done in #1392
exyi
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 4, 2023
Part is taken from #1392 which won't be merged for a while.
exyi
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 1, 2023
Part is taken from #1392 which won't be merged for a while.
exyi
force-pushed
the
resource-datacontext
branch
from
February 25, 2024 16:15
14a7721
to
dd7cf40
Compare
This functionality is essential for server-side only rendering, but this patch is only the groundwork - we still need to add support to Repeater and possibly other controls. The design is fairly simple - we allow resource binding in data context and track that this data context does not exist client-side (see the new ServerSideOnly property). Using this server-only data context is not allowed in value and staticCommand bindings. Note that using a value binding inside the resource-bound control is allowed, it just cannot reference `_this`. Since the context does not exist client-side, we then translate _parent into $data instead of $parent.
exyi
force-pushed
the
resource-datacontext
branch
from
November 23, 2024 19:58
dd7cf40
to
36f7055
Compare
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This functionality allows server-only rendering - i.e. building static HTML based on viewmodel which is not necessarily sent to the client.
The design is fairly simple - we allow resource binding
in data context and track that this data context does
not exist client-side (see the new
ServerSideOnly
property).Using this server-only data context is not allowed in value
and
staticCommand
bindings. Note that using a value bindinginside the resource-bound control is allowed, it just cannot
reference
_this
. Since the context does not exist client-side,we then translate
_parent
into$data
instead of$parent
.Repeater, GridView and HierarchyRepeater should all support this.