Commit
This commit does not belong to any branch on this repository, and may belong to a fork outside of the repository.
chore(deps): update dependency esbuild to v0.19.9 (#9708)
[](https://renovatebot.com) This PR contains the following updates: | Package | Change | Age | Adoption | Passing | Confidence | |---|---|---|---|---|---| | [esbuild](https://togithub.com/evanw/esbuild) | [`0.19.5` -> `0.19.9`](https://renovatebot.com/diffs/npm/esbuild/0.19.5/0.19.9) | [](https://docs.renovatebot.com/merge-confidence/) | [](https://docs.renovatebot.com/merge-confidence/) | [](https://docs.renovatebot.com/merge-confidence/) | [](https://docs.renovatebot.com/merge-confidence/) | --- ### Release Notes <details> <summary>evanw/esbuild (esbuild)</summary> ### [`v0.19.9`](https://togithub.com/evanw/esbuild/blob/HEAD/CHANGELOG.md#0199) [Compare Source](https://togithub.com/evanw/esbuild/compare/v0.19.8...v0.19.9) - Add support for transforming new CSS gradient syntax for older browsers The specification called [CSS Images Module Level 4](https://www.w3.org/TR/css-images-4/) introduces new CSS gradient syntax for customizing how the browser interpolates colors in between color stops. You can now control the color space that the interpolation happens in as well as (for "polar" color spaces) control whether hue angle interpolation happens clockwise or counterclockwise. You can read more about this in [Mozilla's blog post about new CSS gradient features](https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/blog/css-color-module-level-4/). With this release, esbuild will now automatically transform this syntax for older browsers in the `target` list. For example, here's a gradient that should appear as a rainbow in a browser that supports this new syntax: ```css /* Original code */ .rainbow-gradient { width: 100px; height: 100px; background: linear-gradient(in hsl longer hue, #​7ff, #​77f); } /* New output (with --target=chrome99) */ .rainbow-gradient { width: 100px; height: 100px; background: linear-gradient( #​77ffff, #​77ffaa 12.5%, #​77ff80 18.75%, #​84ff77 21.88%, #​99ff77 25%, #eeff77 37.5%, #fffb77 40.62%, #ffe577 43.75%, #ffbb77 50%, #ff9077 56.25%, #ff7b77 59.38%, #ff7788 62.5%, #ff77dd 75%, #ff77f2 78.12%, #f777ff 81.25%, #cc77ff 87.5%, #​7777ff); } ``` You can now use this syntax in your CSS source code and esbuild will automatically convert it to an equivalent gradient for older browsers. In addition, esbuild will now also transform "double position" and "transition hint" syntax for older browsers as appropriate: ```css /* Original code */ .stripes { width: 100px; height: 100px; background: linear-gradient(#e65 33%, #ff2 33% 67%, #​99e 67%); } .glow { width: 100px; height: 100px; background: radial-gradient(white 10%, 20%, black); } /* New output (with --target=chrome33) */ .stripes { width: 100px; height: 100px; background: linear-gradient( #e65 33%, #ff2 33%, #ff2 67%, #​99e 67%); } .glow { width: 100px; height: 100px; background: radial-gradient( #ffffff 10%, #aaaaaa 12.81%, #​959595 15.62%, #​7b7b7b 21.25%, #​5a5a5a 32.5%, #​444444 43.75%, #​323232 55%, #​161616 77.5%, #​000000); } ``` You can see visual examples of these new syntax features by looking at [esbuild's gradient transformation tests](https://esbuild.github.io/gradient-tests/). If necessary, esbuild will construct a new gradient that approximates the original gradient by recursively splitting the interval in between color stops until the approximation error is within a small threshold. That is why the above output CSS contains many more color stops than the input CSS. Note that esbuild deliberately *replaces* the original gradient with the approximation instead of inserting the approximation before the original gradient as a fallback. The latest version of Firefox has multiple gradient rendering bugs (including incorrect interpolation of partially-transparent colors and interpolating non-sRGB colors using the incorrect color space). If esbuild didn't replace the original gradient, then Firefox would use the original gradient instead of the fallback the appearance would be incorrect in Firefox. In other words, the latest version of Firefox supports modern gradient syntax but interprets it incorrectly. - Add support for `color()`, `lab()`, `lch()`, `oklab()`, `oklch()`, and `hwb()` in CSS CSS has recently added lots of new ways of specifying colors. You can read more about this in [Chrome's blog post about CSS color spaces](https://developer.chrome.com/docs/css-ui/high-definition-css-color-guide). This release adds support for minifying colors that use the `color()`, `lab()`, `lch()`, `oklab()`, `oklch()`, or `hwb()` syntax and/or transforming these colors for browsers that don't support it yet: ```css /* Original code */ div { color: hwb(90deg 20% 40%); background: color(display-p3 1 0 0); } /* New output (with --target=chrome99) */ div { color: #​669933; background: #ff0f0e; background: color(display-p3 1 0 0); } ``` As you can see, colors outside of the sRGB color space such as `color(display-p3 1 0 0)` are mapped back into the sRGB gamut and inserted as a fallback for browsers that don't support the new color syntax. - Allow empty type parameter lists in certain cases ([#​3512](https://togithub.com/evanw/esbuild/issues/3512)) TypeScript allows interface declarations and type aliases to have empty type parameter lists. Previously esbuild didn't handle this edge case but with this release, esbuild will now parse this syntax: ```ts interface Foo<> {} type Bar<> = {} ``` This fix was contributed by [@​magic-akari](https://togithub.com/magic-akari). ### [`v0.19.8`](https://togithub.com/evanw/esbuild/blob/HEAD/CHANGELOG.md#0198) [Compare Source](https://togithub.com/evanw/esbuild/compare/v0.19.7...v0.19.8) - Add a treemap chart to esbuild's bundle analyzer ([#​2848](https://togithub.com/evanw/esbuild/issues/2848)) The bundler analyzer on esbuild's website (https://esbuild.github.io/analyze/) now has a treemap chart type in addition to the two existing chart types (sunburst and flame). This should be more familiar for people coming from other similar tools, as well as make better use of large screens. - Allow decorators after the `export` keyword ([#​104](https://togithub.com/evanw/esbuild/issues/104)) Previously esbuild's decorator parser followed the original behavior of TypeScript's experimental decorators feature, which only allowed decorators to come before the `export` keyword. However, the upcoming JavaScript decorators feature also allows decorators to come after the `export` keyword. And with TypeScript 5.0, TypeScript now also allows experimental decorators to come after the `export` keyword too. So esbuild now allows this as well: ```js // This old syntax has always been permitted: @​decorator export class Foo {} @​decorator export default class Foo {} // This new syntax is now permitted too: export @​decorator class Foo {} export default @​decorator class Foo {} ``` In addition, esbuild's decorator parser has been rewritten to fix several subtle and likely unimportant edge cases with esbuild's parsing of exports and decorators in TypeScript (e.g. TypeScript apparently does automatic semicolon insertion after `interface` and `export interface` but not after `export default interface`). - Pretty-print decorators using the same whitespace as the original When printing code containing decorators, esbuild will now try to respect whether the original code contained newlines after the decorator or not. This can make generated code containing many decorators much more compact to read: ```js // Original code class Foo { @​a @​b @​c abc @​x @​y @​z xyz } // Old output class Foo { @​a @​b @​c abc; @​x @​y @​z xyz; } // New output class Foo { @​a @​b @​c abc; @​x @​y @​z xyz; } ``` ### [`v0.19.7`](https://togithub.com/evanw/esbuild/blob/HEAD/CHANGELOG.md#0197) [Compare Source](https://togithub.com/evanw/esbuild/compare/v0.19.6...v0.19.7) - Add support for bundling code that uses import attributes ([#​3384](https://togithub.com/evanw/esbuild/issues/3384)) JavaScript is gaining new syntax for associating a map of string key-value pairs with individual ESM imports. The proposal is still a work in progress and is still undergoing significant changes before being finalized. However, the first iteration has already been shipping in Chromium-based browsers for a while, and the second iteration has landed in V8 and is now shipping in node, so it makes sense for esbuild to support it. Here are the two major iterations of this proposal (so far): 1. Import assertions (deprecated, will not be standardized) - Uses the `assert` keyword - Does *not* affect module resolution - Causes an error if the assertion fails - Shipping in Chrome 91+ (and in esbuild 0.11.22+) 2. Import attributes (currently set to become standardized) - Uses the `with` keyword - Affects module resolution - Unknown attributes cause an error - Shipping in node 21+ You can already use esbuild to bundle code that uses import assertions (the first iteration). However, this feature is mostly useless for bundlers because import assertions are not allowed to affect module resolution. It's basically only useful as an annotation on external imports, which esbuild will then preserve in the output for use in a browser (which would otherwise refuse to load certain imports). With this release, esbuild now supports bundling code that uses import attributes (the second iteration). This is much more useful for bundlers because they are allowed to affect module resolution, which means the key-value pairs can be provided to plugins. Here's an example, which uses esbuild's built-in support for the upcoming [JSON module standard](https://togithub.com/tc39/proposal-json-modules): ```js // On static imports import foo from './package.json' with { type: 'json' } console.log(foo) // On dynamic imports const bar = await import('./package.json', { with: { type: 'json' } }) console.log(bar) ``` One important consequence of the change in semantics between import assertions and import attributes is that two imports with identical paths but different import attributes are now considered to be different modules. This is because the import attributes are provided to the loader, which might then use those attributes during loading. For example, you could imagine an image loader that produces an image of a different size depending on the import attributes. Import attributes are now reported in the [metafile](https://esbuild.github.io/api/#metafile) and are now provided to [on-load plugins](https://esbuild.github.io/plugins/#on-load) as a map in the `with` property. For example, here's an esbuild plugin that turns all imports with a `type` import attribute equal to `'cheese'` into a module that exports the cheese emoji: ```js const cheesePlugin = { name: 'cheese', setup(build) { build.onLoad({ filter: /.*/ }, args => { if (args.with.type === 'cheese') return { contents: `export default "🧀"`, } }) } } require('esbuild').build({ bundle: true, write: false, stdin: { contents: ` import foo from 'data:text/javascript,' with { type: 'cheese' } console.log(foo) `, }, plugins: [cheesePlugin], }).then(result => { const code = new Function(result.outputFiles[0].text) code() }) ``` Warning: It's possible that the second iteration of this feature may change significantly again even though it's already shipping in real JavaScript VMs (since it has already happened once before). In that case, esbuild may end up adjusting its implementation to match the eventual standard behavior. So keep in mind that by using this, you are using an unstable upcoming JavaScript feature that may undergo breaking changes in the future. - Adjust TypeScript experimental decorator behavior ([#​3230](https://togithub.com/evanw/esbuild/issues/3230), [#​3326](https://togithub.com/evanw/esbuild/issues/3326), [#​3394](https://togithub.com/evanw/esbuild/issues/3394)) With this release, esbuild will now allow TypeScript experimental decorators to access both static class properties and `#private` class names. For example: ```js const check = <T,>(a: T, b: T): PropertyDecorator => () => console.log(a === b) async function test() { class Foo { static #foo = 1 static bar = 1 + Foo.#foo @​check(Foo.#foo, 1) a: any @​check(Foo.bar, await Promise.resolve(2)) b: any } } test().then(() => console.log('pass')) ``` This will now print `true true pass` when compiled by esbuild. Previously esbuild evaluated TypeScript decorators outside of the class body, so it didn't allow decorators to access `Foo` or `#foo`. Now esbuild does something different, although it's hard to concisely explain exactly what esbuild is doing now (see the background section below for more information). Note that TypeScript's experimental decorator support is currently buggy: TypeScript's compiler passes this test if only the first `@check` is present or if only the second `@check` is present, but TypeScript's compiler fails this test if both checks are present together. I haven't changed esbuild to match TypeScript's behavior exactly here because I'm waiting for TypeScript to fix these bugs instead. Some background: TypeScript experimental decorators don't have consistent semantics regarding the context that the decorators are evaluated in. For example, TypeScript will let you use `await` within a decorator, which implies that the decorator runs outside the class body (since `await` isn't supported inside a class body), but TypeScript will also let you use `#private` names, which implies that the decorator runs inside the class body (since `#private` names are only supported inside a class body). The value of `this` in a decorator is also buggy (the run-time value of `this` changes if any decorator in the class uses a `#private` name but the type of `this` doesn't change, leading to the type checker no longer matching reality). These inconsistent semantics make it hard for esbuild to implement this feature as decorator evaluation happens in some superposition of both inside and outside the class body that is particular to the internal implementation details of the TypeScript compiler. - Forbid `--keep-names` when targeting old browsers ([#​3477](https://togithub.com/evanw/esbuild/issues/3477)) The `--keep-names` setting needs to be able to assign to the `name` property on functions and classes. However, before ES6 this property was non-configurable, and attempting to assign to it would throw an error. So with this release, esbuild will no longer allow you to enable this setting while also targeting a really old browser. ### [`v0.19.6`](https://togithub.com/evanw/esbuild/blob/HEAD/CHANGELOG.md#0196) [Compare Source](https://togithub.com/evanw/esbuild/compare/v0.19.5...v0.19.6) - Fix a constant folding bug with bigint equality This release fixes a bug where esbuild incorrectly checked for bigint equality by checking the equality of the bigint literal text. This is correct if the bigint doesn't have a radix because bigint literals without a radix are always in canonical form (since leading zeros are not allowed). However, this is incorrect if the bigint has a radix (e.g. `0x123n`) because the canonical form is not enforced when a radix is present. ```js // Original code console.log(!!0n, !!1n, 123n === 123n) console.log(!!0x0n, !!0x1n, 123n === 0x7Bn) // Old output console.log(false, true, true); console.log(true, true, false); // New output console.log(false, true, true); console.log(!!0x0n, !!0x1n, 123n === 0x7Bn); ``` - Add some improvements to the JavaScript minifier This release adds more cases to the JavaScript minifier, including support for inlining `String.fromCharCode` and `String.prototype.charCodeAt` when possible: ```js // Original code document.onkeydown = e => e.keyCode === 'A'.charCodeAt(0) && console.log(String.fromCharCode(55358, 56768)) // Old output (with --minify) document.onkeydown=o=>o.keyCode==="A".charCodeAt(0)&&console.log(String.fromCharCode(55358,56768)); // New output (with --minify) document.onkeydown=o=>o.keyCode===65&&console.log("🧀"); ``` In addition, immediately-invoked function expressions (IIFEs) that return a single expression are now inlined when minifying. This makes it possible to use IIFEs in combination with `@__PURE__` annotations to annotate arbitrary expressions as side-effect free without the IIFE wrapper impacting code size. For example: ```js // Original code const sideEffectFreeOffset = /* @​__PURE__ */ (() => computeSomething())() use(sideEffectFreeOffset) // Old output (with --minify) const e=(()=>computeSomething())();use(e); // New output (with --minify) const e=computeSomething();use(e); ``` - Automatically prefix the `mask-composite` CSS property for WebKit ([#​3493](https://togithub.com/evanw/esbuild/issues/3493)) The `mask-composite` property will now be prefixed as `-webkit-mask-composite` for older WebKit-based browsers. In addition to prefixing the property name, handling older browsers also requires rewriting the values since WebKit uses non-standard names for the mask composite modes: ```css /* Original code */ div { mask-composite: add, subtract, intersect, exclude; } /* New output (with --target=chrome100) */ div { -webkit-mask-composite: source-over, source-out, source-in, xor; mask-composite: add, subtract, intersect, exclude; } ``` - Avoid referencing `this` from JSX elements in derived class constructors ([#​3454](https://togithub.com/evanw/esbuild/issues/3454)) When you enable `--jsx=automatic` and `--jsx-dev`, the JSX transform is supposed to insert `this` as the last argument to the `jsxDEV` function. I'm not sure exactly why this is and I can't find any specification for it, but in any case this causes the generated code to crash when you use a JSX element in a derived class constructor before the call to `super()` as `this` is not allowed to be accessed at that point. For example ```js // Original code class ChildComponent extends ParentComponent { constructor() { super(<div />) } } // Problematic output (with --loader=jsx --jsx=automatic --jsx-dev) import { jsxDEV } from "react/jsx-dev-runtime"; class ChildComponent extends ParentComponent { constructor() { super(/* @​__PURE__ */ jsxDEV("div", {}, void 0, false, { fileName: "<stdin>", lineNumber: 3, columnNumber: 15 }, this)); // The reference to "this" crashes here } } ``` The TypeScript compiler doesn't handle this at all while the Babel compiler just omits `this` for the entire constructor (even after the call to `super()`). There seems to be no specification so I can't be sure that this change doesn't break anything important. But given that Babel is pretty loose with this and TypeScript doesn't handle this at all, I'm guessing this value isn't too important. React's blog post seems to indicate that this value was intended to be used for a React-specific migration warning at some point, so it could even be that this value is irrelevant now. Anyway the crash in this case should now be fixed. - Allow package subpath imports to map to node built-ins ([#​3485](https://togithub.com/evanw/esbuild/issues/3485)) You are now able to use a [subpath import](https://nodejs.org/api/packages.html#subpath-imports) in your package to resolve to a node built-in module. For example, with a `package.json` file like this: ```json { "type": "module", "imports": { "#stream": { "node": "stream", "default": "./stub.js" } } } ``` You can now import from node's `stream` module like this: ```js import * as stream from '#stream'; console.log(Object.keys(stream)); ``` This will import from node's `stream` module when the platform is `node` and from `./stub.js` otherwise. - No longer throw an error when a `Symbol` is missing ([#​3453](https://togithub.com/evanw/esbuild/issues/3453)) Certain JavaScript syntax features use special properties on the global `Symbol` object. For example, the asynchronous iteration syntax uses `Symbol.asyncIterator`. Previously esbuild's generated code for older browsers required this symbol to be polyfilled. However, starting with this release esbuild will use [`Symbol.for()`](https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/Global_Objects/Symbol/for) to construct these symbols if they are missing instead of throwing an error about a missing polyfill. This means your code no longer needs to include a polyfill for missing symbols as long as your code also uses `Symbol.for()` for missing symbols. - Parse upcoming changes to TypeScript syntax ([#​3490](https://togithub.com/evanw/esbuild/issues/3490), [#​3491](https://togithub.com/evanw/esbuild/pull/3491)) With this release, you can now use `from` as the name of a default type-only import in TypeScript code, as well as `of` as the name of an `await using` loop iteration variable: ```ts import type from from 'from' for (await using of of of) ; ``` This matches similar changes in the TypeScript compiler ([#​56376](https://togithub.com/microsoft/TypeScript/issues/56376) and [#​55555](https://togithub.com/microsoft/TypeScript/issues/55555)) which will start allowing this syntax in an upcoming version of TypeScript. Please never actually write code like this. The type-only import syntax change was contributed by [@​magic-akari](https://togithub.com/magic-akari). </details> --- ### Configuration 📅 **Schedule**: Branch creation - At any time (no schedule defined), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined). 🚦 **Automerge**: Enabled. ♻ **Rebasing**: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox. 🔕 **Ignore**: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about these updates again. --- - [ ] <!-- rebase-check -->If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box --- This PR has been generated by [Mend Renovate](https://www.mend.io/free-developer-tools/renovate/). View repository job log [here](https://developer.mend.io/github/redwoodjs/redwood). <!--renovate-debug:eyJjcmVhdGVkSW5WZXIiOiIzNy44Ny4yIiwidXBkYXRlZEluVmVyIjoiMzcuODcuMiIsInRhcmdldEJyYW5jaCI6Im1haW4ifQ==--> Co-authored-by: renovate[bot] <29139614+renovate[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Dominic Saadi <[email protected]>
](https://renovatebot.com){kind=link}
- Loading branch information
1 parent
0d1e09a
commit fb53f42