Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

🌱 Use calico as alternative to kindnet in e2e tests, and start testing helm chart proxy #448

Closed
wants to merge 5 commits into from

Conversation

Danil-Grigorev
Copy link
Contributor

What this PR does / why we need it:
This PR provides alternative to kindnet network setup with calico. In my environment it is needed to make the local tests pass.

Additionally this introduces tests for helm addon provider as means for installing Calico CNI in the child cluster.

Which issue(s) this PR fixes (optional, in fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...) format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged):
Fixes #

Special notes for your reviewer:

Checklist:

  • squashed commits into logical changes
  • includes documentation
  • adds unit tests
  • adds or updates e2e tests

@Danil-Grigorev Danil-Grigorev requested a review from a team as a code owner March 27, 2024 09:51
@Danil-Grigorev Danil-Grigorev force-pushed the use-calico branch 2 times, most recently from 17ca395 to 35d7754 Compare March 27, 2024 10:19
Signed-off-by: Danil Grigorev <[email protected]>
Copy link
Member

@alexander-demicev alexander-demicev left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

approved, I like that we will include CAPI addon providers in tests, @Danil-Grigorev please fix the conflict

@salasberryfin
Copy link
Contributor

@Danil-Grigorev looks like this needs a rebase. Just out of curiosity, do you still need this change to run the test suite locally after changing the CIDR block to potentially avoid collisions?

@Danil-Grigorev
Copy link
Contributor Author

I think this can be closed now. Remaining functionality of this PR is superseded by #654

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants