Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Customize FP8 grouped GEMM for non-zero calculation for token choice MoE #3383

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

jiawenliu64
Copy link
Member

Summary: Customize FP8 grouped GEMM for non-zero calculation for token choice MoE with dynamic dim M

Reviewed By: jianyuh

Differential Revision: D65989604

Copy link

netlify bot commented Nov 15, 2024

Deploy Preview for pytorch-fbgemm-docs ready!

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit fe07f16
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/sites/pytorch-fbgemm-docs/deploys/6737e2967ff78e00087f6e31
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-3383--pytorch-fbgemm-docs.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration.

@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D65989604

…MoE (pytorch#3383)

Summary:

X-link: facebookresearch/FBGEMM#471

Customize FP8 grouped GEMM for non-zero calculation for token choice MoE with dynamic dim M

Reviewed By: jianyuh

Differential Revision: D65989604
@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D65989604

jiawenliu64 added a commit to jiawenliu64/FBGEMM that referenced this pull request Nov 16, 2024
…MoE (pytorch#3383)

Summary:
Pull Request resolved: pytorch#3383

X-link: facebookresearch/FBGEMM#471

Customize FP8 grouped GEMM for non-zero calculation for token choice MoE with dynamic dim M

Differential Revision: D65989604

Reviewed By: jianyuh
@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request has been merged in 8812a95.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants