feat: Converting Drizzle tables to Powersync tables #408
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
🦋 Changeset detectedLatest commit: 3f4f471 The changes in this PR will be included in the next version bump. This PR includes changesets to release 1 package
Not sure what this means? Click here to learn what changesets are. Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add another changeset to this PR |
Using getTableConfig instead of iterating keys.
# Conflicts: # packages/drizzle-driver/src/index.ts
Chriztiaan
force-pushed
the
feat/drizzle-schema
branch
from
2e8a768 to
dadddfd
Compare
Chriztiaan
changed the title
…nc-js into feat/drizzle-schema
# Conflicts: # packages/drizzle-driver/src/index.ts
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description
With the current Drizzle integration users need to maintain two table schema definitions (one for Drizzle and one for PowerSync). The initial idea was to infer a Drizzle schema from the PowerSync schema, but based on feedback and some testing it's clear that a Drizzle schema can be more complex and extensive (for example it supports relations) than a PowerSync schema, so the first stab at having a unified schema definition would be to start from a Drizzle schema.
This PR introduces
DrizzleAppSchemaandtoPowerSyncTable, which allows you to map your Drizzle schema, or tables individually, to a PowerSync AppSchema. The mechanism for defining PowerSync table options are illustrated in the Readme and unit tests. PowerSync table indices can be derived from the Drizzle table indices, so that option is omitted from the options.Limitations
text,integer,real.