chore(deps): update pypa/gh-action-pypi-publish action to v1.12.3

[renovate]

This PR contains the following updates:

Package	Type	Update	Change
pypa/gh-action-pypi-publish	action	minor	v1.8.10 -> v1.12.3

---

Release Notes

pypa/gh-action-pypi-publish (pypa/gh-action-pypi-publish)

v1.12.3

Compare Source

v1.12.2

Compare Source

🐛 What's Fixed

The fix for signing legacy zip sdists turned out to be incomplete, so @​woodruffw💰 promptly produced another follow-up that updated pypi-attestations from v0.0.13 to v0.0.15 in #​297. This is the only change since the previous release.

🪞 Full Diff: pypa/gh-action-pypi-publish@v1.12.1...v1.12.2

🧔‍♂️ Release Manager: @​webknjaz 🇺🇦

v1.12.1

Compare Source

🐛 What's Fixed

Version v1.12.0 hit several rare corner cases we never considered fully supported, and this release fixes a few of those.
In #​294, @​webknjaz💰 improved the self-hosted runner experience by pre-installing Python if it's not there, and with #​293 the ability to use the action on GitHub Enterprise instances has been restored. The latter should've also fixed the ability to invoke [pypi-publish][pypi-publish] from nested in-repo composite actions — another exotic use-case that was never tested in our CI.
@​woodruffw💰 also managed to squeeze in a last-minute fix for detecting legacy .zip sdists while producing attestations via #​295.

🪞 Full Diff: pypa/gh-action-pypi-publish@v1.12.0...v1.12.1

🧔‍♂️ Release Manager: @​webknjaz 🇺🇦

🙏 Huge Thanks to all the bug reporters for posting the logs, helping inspect the problems and verify the regression fixes!

v1.12.0

Compare Source

⚡️ Why Should You Update?

This is a minor version bump, but it does not add any new user-facing interfaces. Still, I felt like it should not be a patch-release: this update brings significant changes to the action invocation and internal release process.

Previously, each invocation of [pypi-publish][pypi-publish] required building a container image in the invoking CI job. This was inefficient and added about 30 seconds to the publishing jobs at their startup just to build the container.

I wanted to improve this for over three years (#​58) and a little over half a year ago @​br3ndonland💰 stepped up and offered a very comprehensive solution to the limitation I was hoping to overcome: #​230.

Going forward, I'm going to pre-build per-version containers prior to cutting each release. And the action invocations will just pull the image from GitHub Container registry.

[!CAUTION]
Known quirks:

• This seems to not work on self-hosted runners without a python executable: #​289. The workaround could be installing it prior to running the action.
• ~Pinning to commit hashes does not work: #​290. Workaround: postpone updating until it's fixed or switch to Git tags for now. Subscribe to that issue to follow the progress.~ UPD: This was an issue during the first 12 hours post release and it has been addressed upstream by publishing a commit SHA-tagged image for the release on Nov 12, 2024 at 10:27 UTC+1.
• Calling pypi-publish from another nested repo-local composite action might be breaking file paths: #​291. Workaround: postpone updating until it's fixed. Subscribe to that issue to follow the progress.
• Running within GitHub Enterprise fails on the action repo clone: #​292. Workaround: postpone updating until it's fixed. Subscribe to that issue to follow the progress.

🪞 Full Diff: pypa/gh-action-pypi-publish@v1.11.0...v1.12.0

🧔‍♂️ Release Manager: @​webknjaz 🇺🇦

v1.11.0

Compare Source

🔏 Helping you become a trusted supply chain link 🔗

Two months ago, in v1.10.0, @​woodruffw💰 integrated support for generating and uploading PEP 740 digital attestations that can be used as provenance objects when analyzing dependency chains for the integrity.

To make sure it works well, it was implemented as an opt-in, so a relatively small subset of projects was able to try it out, and a few issues have been determined and fixed during this time.

That changes today! This version changes the feature toggle to “on by default”. This means that from now on, every project making use of Trusted Publishing will start producing and publishing digital attestations without having to do any modifications to how they use this action.

@​woodruffw💰 flipped the respective toggle in #​277 with the possibility to opt-out.

🛠️ Internal Dependencies

@​woodruffw💰 bumped sigstore to v3.5.1 and pypi-attestations to v0.0.13 in lock files via #​276.

🪞 Full Diff: pypa/gh-action-pypi-publish@v1.10.3...v1.11.0

🧔‍♂️ Release Manager: @​webknjaz 🇺🇦

🙏 Special Thanks to William for working on improving the supply chain provenance in the ecosystem! The overall effort is tracked @&#https://github.com/pypi/warehouse/issues/15871/15871.

v1.10.3

Compare Source

💅 Cosmetic Output Improvements

In #​270, @​facutuesca💰 made a follow-up to their previous PR #​250, making the hints show up more granularly. This effectively makes sure that the suggestion to enable Trusted Publishing does not get displayed when it's already in use. It also makes the message nicer in a few places on the UI.

🛠️ Internal Dependencies

@​mosfet80💰 updated a few internal linter versions in #​266, #​267, and #​271, no user impact. This is usually automated otherwise.

💪 New Contributors

• @​mosfet80 made their first contribution in https://github.com/pypa/gh-action-pypi-publish/pull/266

🪞 Full Diff: pypa/gh-action-pypi-publish@v1.10.2...v1.10.3

🧔‍♂️ Release Manager: @​webknjaz 🇺🇦

v1.10.2

Compare Source

💅 Cosmetic Output Improvements

In #​250 and #​258, @​facutuesca💰 added a nudge message with a magic link to pre-fill the creation of new Trusted Publishers configurations on PyPI. The users are now suggested to configure tokenless publishing by clicking a link printed in the job summary when it's detected that they publish to PyPI or TestPyPI. Just like magic! 🦄

🛠️ Internal Dependencies

@​woodruffw💰 bumped pypi-attestations to v0.0.12 in #​262, fixing #​263.

[!TIP]
Please keep in mind that reusable workflows are not yet supported, even though they sometimes work, mostly by accident.

💪 New Contributors

@​facutuesca made their first contribution in https://github.com/pypa/gh-action-pypi-publish/pull/258

🪞 Full Diff: pypa/gh-action-pypi-publish@v1.10.1...v1.10.2

🧔‍♂️ Release Manager: @​webknjaz 🇺🇦

🙏 Special Thanks to @​henryiii💰 for promptly pointing up possible fixes for #​263.

v1.10.1

Compare Source

🚑🔏 Oopsie... We missed a tiny bug in the attestations feature the other day

The problem was that the distribution file validity check was failing on any valid distribution being present and ready to be signed. What a silly mistake! It's now been fixed via pypa/gh-action-pypi-publish@0ab0b79, though. So everything's good!

-- @​webknjaz💰

[!IMPORTANT]
✨ Despite this minor hiccup, we invite you to still opt into trying this feature out early. It can be enabled like this:

  with:
    attestations: true

Leave feedback in the v1.10.0 release discussion or the PR.

🪞 Full Diff: pypa/gh-action-pypi-publish@v1.10.0...v1.10.1

🧔‍♂️ Release Manager: @​webknjaz 🇺🇦

🙏 Special Thanks to @​hugovk💰 for promptly validating the bug fix, mere minutes after I pushed it — I even haven't finished writing this text by then!

v1.10.0

Compare Source

🔏 Anything fancy, eh?

This time, @​woodruffw💰 implemented support for PEP 740 attestations functionality in #​236 and #​245. This is a big deal, as it is a huge step forward to replacing what the deprecated GPG signatures used to provide in a more meaningful way.

[!IMPORTANT]
✨ Please, do opt into trying this feature out early. It can be enabled as follows:

  with:
    attestations: true

Leave any feedback on this in this release discussion or the PR.

🙏 And please, thank William for working on this amazing improvement for the ecosystem! The overall effort is tracked @&#https://github.com/pypi/warehouse/issues/15871/15871, by the way.

🪞 Full Diff: pypa/gh-action-pypi-publish@v1.9.0...v1.10.0

🧔‍♂️ Release Manager: @​webknjaz 🇺🇦

v1.9.0

Compare Source

💅 Cosmetic Output Improvements

• @​woodruffw💰 updated the tense on password nudge in #​234
• @​shenxianpeng💰 helped us disable the progress bar that was being produced by the twine upload command via #​231
• @​woodruffw💰 also linked the PyPI status dashboard in the trusted publishing error message via https://github.com/pypa/gh-action-pypi-publish/pull/243

🛠️ Internal Dependencies

• pre-commit linters got auto-updated @​ #​225
• some notable dependency bumps include
  • cryptography == 42.0.7
  • id == 1.4.0
  • idna == 3.7 via #​228
  • requests == 2.32.0 via #​240
  • Twine == 5.1.0

⚙️ Secret Stuff

In #​241, @​br3ndonland💰 added a Docker label linking the container image to this repository for GHCR to display it nicely. This is preparatory work for a big performance-focused refactoring he's working on in #​230.

💪 New Contributors

• @​shenxianpeng made their first contribution in https://github.com/pypa/gh-action-pypi-publish/pull/231
• @​br3ndonland made their first contribution in https://github.com/pypa/gh-action-pypi-publish/pull/241

🪞 Full Diff: pypa/gh-action-pypi-publish@v1.8.14...v1.9.0

🧔‍♂️ Release Manager: @​webknjaz 🇺🇦

🙏 Special Thanks to @​pradyunsg💰 for promptly unblocking this release to Marketplace as GitHub started asking for yet another developer agreement signature from the organization admins.

v1.8.14

Compare Source

🛠️ Internal Dependencies

Nothing changed feature-wise. The only notable update is that the underlying container runtime now uses Python 3.12 and pip has been updated to v24.0 there.
This is should go unnoticed in terms of behavior. It's just a bit of maintenance burden to be done occasionally by @​webknjaz💰.
Enjoy!

🪞 Full Diff: pypa/gh-action-pypi-publish@v1.8.13...v1.8.14

🧔‍♂️ Release Manager: @​webknjaz 🇺🇦

v1.8.13

Compare Source

🐛 What's Fixed

This action is now able to consume and publish distribution packages with Metadata-Version: 2.3 embedded.

🛠️ Internal Dependencies

@​SigureMo💰 sent us a bump of pkginfo version to version 1.10.0 in #​219. It's a transitive dependency for us and is not an API-level change but upgrading it has a side effect of letting Twine recognize distribution packages declaring Metadata-Version: 2.3. In particular, it is known to affect distributions built with Maturin >= 1.5.0.

Following that, @​webknjaz💰 upgraded other transitive and direct dependency pins, including, among others, the following notable bumps:

• cryptography == 42.0.5
• id == 1.3.0
• readme-renderer == 43.0
• Twine == 5.0.0

💪 New Contributors

@​SigureMo made their first contribution in https://github.com/pypa/gh-action-pypi-publish/pull/219

🪞 Full Diff: pypa/gh-action-pypi-publish@v1.8.12...v1.8.13

🧔‍♂️ Release Manager: @​webknjaz 🇺🇦

v1.8.12

Compare Source

💅 Cosmetic Output Improvements

@​woodruffw💰 replaced the notice annotations with simplified debug messages related to authentication methanism selection via #​196. The also improved the error clarity during OIDC exchange on PRs from forks via #​203.

📝 What's Documented

@​virtuald💰 updated the docs and pointer messages were updated to mention that reusable workflows aren't supported right now in #​186 and @​xuanzhi33💰 later corrected the markdown syntax there via #​216.

🛠️ Internal Dependencies

• pre-commit linters got autoupdated @​ #​204
• Cryptography was bumped from 41.0.6 to 42.0.4 @​ #​210, #​213 and #​214

⚙️ Secret Stuff

@​woodruffw proactively updated the OIDC minting API endpoint used during the exchange via #​206. Nothing you should be too concerned about, promise!

💪 New Contributors

• @​virtuald made their first contribution in https://github.com/pypa/gh-action-pypi-publish/pull/186
• @​xuanzhi33 made their first contribution in https://github.com/pypa/gh-action-pypi-publish/pull/216

🪞 Full Diff: pypa/gh-action-pypi-publish@v1.8.11...v1.8.12

🧔‍♂️ Release Manager: @​webknjaz 🇺🇦

v1.8.11

Compare Source

💅 Cosmetic output improvements

@​woodruffw added a nudge suggesting the users storing passwords in a GitHub Actions repository secrets to switch to using secretless publishing in https://github.com/pypa/gh-action-pypi-publish/pull/190. This also reminds people that PyPI will start mandating two-factor authentication to perform uploads in 2024.

📝 What's Documented

@​di linked the configuration docs for Trusted Publishing in README via https://github.com/pypa/gh-action-pypi-publish/pull/179.

🛠️ Internal dependencies

• Cryptography was bumped from 41.0.3 to 41.0.6 @&#https://github.com/pypa/gh-action-pypi-publish/pull/194ll/194
• Pip was bumped from 22.3.1 to 23.3 @&#https://github.com/pypa/gh-action-pypi-publish/pull/189ll/189
• pre-commit linters got autoupdated @&#https://github.com/pypa/gh-action-pypi-publish/pull/184ll/184
• Urllib3 was bumped from 2.0.3 to 2.0.7 @&#https://github.com/pypa/gh-action-pypi-publish/pull/183ll/18https://github.com/pypa/gh-action-pypi-publish/pull/185ll/185

💪 New Contributors

• @​di made their first contribution in https://github.com/pypa/gh-action-pypi-publish/pull/179

🪞 Full Diff: pypa/gh-action-pypi-publish@v1.8.10...v1.8.11

---

Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - At any time (no schedule defined), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

♻ Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.

---

• If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

---

This PR was generated by Mend Renovate. View the repository job log.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 37.00%. Comparing base (e5a0899) to head (617c61e).
Report is 2 commits behind head on main.

❗ Current head 617c61e differs from pull request most recent head a0a420a

Please upload reports for the commit a0a420a to get more accurate results.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #271   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   37.00%   37.00%           
=======================================
  Files          23       23           
  Lines        1481     1481           
  Branches      202      202           
=======================================
  Hits          548      548           
  Misses        925      925           
  Partials        8        8           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.