feat: add scopes validator for logical evalulation

[JarekKa]

This feature introduces logical "OR" in the scope validation. Any match would suffice here. Example below. Details in issue.

Example of a match:
"required_scope": ["scope1", "scope2"]
token scopes: "scope1"

Related issue(s)

#1129

Checklist

• I have read the contributing guidelines.
• I have referenced an issue containing the design document if my change
  introduces a new feature.
• I am following the
  contributing code guidelines.
• I have read the security policy.
• I confirm that this pull request does not address a security
  vulnerability. If this pull request addresses a security vulnerability, I
  confirm that I got the approval (please contact
  [email protected]) from the maintainers to push
  the changes.
• I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature
  works.
• I have added or changed the documentation.

Further Comments

Corresponding docs PR: ory/docs#1608

[CLAassistant]

All committers have signed the CLA.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (b5d4d88) 78.16% compared to head (de27dca) 77.72%.
Report is 1 commits behind head on master.

❗ Current head de27dca differs from pull request most recent head c096e04. Consider uploading reports for the commit c096e04 to get more accurate results

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #1143      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   78.16%   77.72%   -0.45%     
==========================================
  Files          80       80              
  Lines        3898     4036     +138     
==========================================
+ Hits         3047     3137      +90     
- Misses        576      618      +42     
- Partials      275      281       +6     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[JarekKa]

I couldn't reproduce linter check issues locally. Dockers issues seem to pop up in other PR too. https://github.com/ory/oathkeeper/pull/1138/checks
For now I don't want to bloat PR with dependency bumps.