query: process RHS according to its type + tests

`Field.get_db_prep_lookup` merely "prepares" the right hand side operand,
and returns a (sql, params) pair.  For a plain value `params` will simply
be the value itself; compound expressions with `as_sql` method, however,
are never designed to work with `get_db_prep_lookup` and instead needs
their `as_sql` method called directly to retrieve the pair.

The error message has been changed from time to time across Django
versions.  Related issues include:

 * disqus#89 "can't adapt type 'CombinedExpression'" in admin filter

   Since Django 1.10 removed `Field.get_db_prep_lookup`,
   `Lookup.get_db_prep_lookup` implementation is simply as follows.

   ```python
   def get_db_prep_lookup(self, value, connection):
       return ('%s', [value])
   ```

   `CombinedExpression` is an expression type returned by combining
   exprssions with operators, such as `__add__` or `bitor`.

   They are never meant to be passed to the SQL engine directly;
   instead, it has an `as_sql` method that returns what we want.

   `process_rhs` first applies any bilateral transforms on both sides,
   and if it finds either `as_sql` or `_as_sql` method on the RHS,
   calls it and wraps the SQL in the pair with parentheses; otherwise,
   it diverts to the usual `get_db_prep_lookup` as above.

 * disqus#64 'CombinedExpression' object is not iterable when using an admin filter on Django 1.8

   Same as above, except `Lookup.get_db_prep_lookup` is as follows.

   ```python
   def get_db_prep_lookup(self, value, connection):
       return (
           '%s', self.lhs.output_field.get_db_prep_lookup(
               self.lookup_name, value, connection, prepared=True))
   ```

   Following is the relevant part of `Field.get_db_prep_lookup`.

   ```python
   def get_db_prep_lookup(self, lookup_type, value, connection,
                          prepared=False):
       """
       Returns field's value prepared for database lookup.
       """
       if not prepared:
           value = self.get_prep_lookup(lookup_type, value)
           prepared = True
       if hasattr(value, 'get_compiler'):
           value = value.get_compiler(connection=connection)
       if hasattr(value, 'as_sql') or hasattr(value, '_as_sql'):
           # If the value has a relabeled_clone method it means the
           # value will be handled later on.
           if hasattr(value, 'relabeled_clone'):
               return value
           if hasattr(value, 'as_sql'):
               sql, params = value.as_sql()
           else:
               sql, params = value._as_sql(connection=connection)
           return QueryWrapper(('(%s)' % sql), params)

       if lookup_type in ('month', 'day', 'week_day', 'hour', 'minute',
                          'second', 'search', 'regex', 'iregex', 'contains',
                          'icontains', 'iexact', 'startswith', 'endswith',
                          'istartswith', 'iendswith'):
           return [value]
   ```

   Normally it is supposed to return the parameters for the SQL
   "prepared statement" as a `list`; however, if the value has either
   `as_sql` or `_as_sql`, it either returns the value directly if it
   also has `relabeled_clone` (which is the case for expressions) or
   wraps it in `QueryWrapper`.  This is not a desired behavior, and
   using them would result in `TypeError` saying the object was not
   iterable since they were not lists in the first place.

 * disqus#61 'SQLEvaluator' object is not iterable when using admin filter on Django 1.7

   Same as above, except `SQLEvaluator` emerges from the SQL compiler
   wrapping expressions for internal use.

    - Update expressions:
      django.db.models.sql.compiler.SQLUpdateCompiler.as_sql:

      ...
      if hasattr(val, 'evaluate'):
          val = SQLEvaluator(val, self.query, allow_joins=False)
      ...

    - filter() resolution:
      django.db.models.sql.query.Query.add_filter:

      ...
      elif isinstance(value, ExpressionNode):
          # If value is a query expression, evaluate it
          value = SQLEvaluator(value, self, reuse=can_reuse)
          having_clause = value.contains_aggregate
      ...

This commit also causes "regression" for the following issue; its
legitimacy, however, is ambiguous considering that the lookup
essentially "hijacks" the original definition of 'exact'.

 disqus#26 admin BitFieldListFilter not working as expected

It should be noted, however, that the original behavior is still
possible to achieve by wrapping the `int` in a `BitHandler`.  Fixing
this correctly would involve treating `int` as `Bit` as before while
showing a deprecation warning.  Meanwhile `filter(flags=Value(4))` will
find a record of which `flags` is exactly `4` across all versions.

bitfield/query.py

@@ -5,22 +5,28 @@
 
 
 class BitQueryLookupWrapper(Exact):  # NOQA
-    def process_lhs(self, qn, connection, lhs=None):
-        lhs_sql, params = super(BitQueryLookupWrapper, self).process_lhs(
-            qn, connection, lhs)
-        if self.rhs:
-            lhs_sql = lhs_sql + ' & %s'
-        else:
-            lhs_sql = lhs_sql + ' | %s'
-        params.extend(self.get_db_prep_lookup(self.rhs, connection)[1])
-        return lhs_sql, params
+    def process_lhs(self, compiler, connection, lhs=None):
+        lhs_sql, lhs_params = super(BitQueryLookupWrapper, self).process_lhs(
+            compiler, connection, lhs)
+
+        if not isinstance(self.rhs, (BitHandler, Bit)):
+            return lhs_sql, lhs_params
+
+        op = ' & ' if self.rhs else ' | '
+        rhs_sql, rhs_params = self.process_rhs(compiler, connection)
+        params = list(lhs_params)
+        params.extend(rhs_params)
+
+        return op.join((lhs_sql, rhs_sql)), params
 
     def get_db_prep_lookup(self, value, connection, prepared=False):
         v = value.mask if isinstance(value, (BitHandler, Bit)) else value
         return super(BitQueryLookupWrapper, self).get_db_prep_lookup(v, connection)
 
     def get_prep_lookup(self):
-        return self.rhs
+        if isinstance(self.rhs, (BitHandler, Bit)):
+            return self.rhs  # resolve at later stage, in get_db_prep_lookup
+        return super(BitQueryLookupWrapper, self).get_prep_lookup()
 
 
 class BitQuerySaveWrapper(BitQueryLookupWrapper):

bitfield/tests/tests.py

@@ -178,6 +178,28 @@ def test_select(self):
         self.assertFalse(BitFieldTestModel.objects.exclude(flags=BitFieldTestModel.flags.FLAG_0).exists())
         self.assertFalse(BitFieldTestModel.objects.exclude(flags=BitFieldTestModel.flags.FLAG_1).exists())
 
+    def test_select_complex_expression(self):
+        BitFieldTestModel.objects.create(flags=3)
+        self.assertTrue(BitFieldTestModel.objects.filter(flags=F('flags').bitor(BitFieldTestModel.flags.FLAG_1)).exists())
+        self.assertTrue(BitFieldTestModel.objects.filter(flags=F('flags').bitor(BitFieldTestModel.flags.FLAG_0)).exists())
+        self.assertTrue(BitFieldTestModel.objects.filter(flags=F('flags').bitor(BitFieldTestModel.flags.FLAG_0).bitor(BitFieldTestModel.flags.FLAG_1)).exists())
+        self.assertTrue(BitFieldTestModel.objects.filter(flags=F('flags').bitand(BitFieldTestModel.flags.FLAG_0 | BitFieldTestModel.flags.FLAG_1)).exists())
+        self.assertTrue(BitFieldTestModel.objects.filter(flags=F('flags').bitand(15)).exists())
+        self.assertTrue(BitFieldTestModel.objects.exclude(flags=F('flags').bitand(BitFieldTestModel.flags.FLAG_2)).exists())
+        self.assertTrue(BitFieldTestModel.objects.exclude(flags=F('flags').bitand(BitFieldTestModel.flags.FLAG_3)).exists())
+        self.assertTrue(BitFieldTestModel.objects.exclude(flags=F('flags').bitand(BitFieldTestModel.flags.FLAG_2 | BitFieldTestModel.flags.FLAG_3)).exists())
+        self.assertTrue(BitFieldTestModel.objects.exclude(flags=F('flags').bitand(12)).exists())
+
+        self.assertFalse(BitFieldTestModel.objects.exclude(flags=F('flags').bitor(BitFieldTestModel.flags.FLAG_1)).exists())
+        self.assertFalse(BitFieldTestModel.objects.exclude(flags=F('flags').bitor(BitFieldTestModel.flags.FLAG_0)).exists())
+        self.assertFalse(BitFieldTestModel.objects.exclude(flags=F('flags').bitor(BitFieldTestModel.flags.FLAG_0).bitor(BitFieldTestModel.flags.FLAG_1)).exists())
+        self.assertFalse(BitFieldTestModel.objects.exclude(flags=F('flags').bitand(BitFieldTestModel.flags.FLAG_0 | BitFieldTestModel.flags.FLAG_1)).exists())
+        self.assertFalse(BitFieldTestModel.objects.exclude(flags=F('flags').bitand(15)).exists())
+        self.assertFalse(BitFieldTestModel.objects.filter(flags=F('flags').bitand(BitFieldTestModel.flags.FLAG_2)).exists())
+        self.assertFalse(BitFieldTestModel.objects.filter(flags=F('flags').bitand(BitFieldTestModel.flags.FLAG_3)).exists())
+        self.assertFalse(BitFieldTestModel.objects.filter(flags=F('flags').bitand(BitFieldTestModel.flags.FLAG_2 | BitFieldTestModel.flags.FLAG_3)).exists())
+        self.assertFalse(BitFieldTestModel.objects.filter(flags=F('flags').bitand(12)).exists())
+
     def test_update(self):
         instance = BitFieldTestModel.objects.create(flags=0)
         self.assertFalse(instance.flags.FLAG_0)