Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

add Use WorkloadSpread with customized workload manual #209

Conversation

AiRanthem
Copy link
Member

add Use WorkloadSpread with customized workload manual to 1.6 1.7 1.8

@AiRanthem AiRanthem force-pushed the feature/Use-WorkloadSpread-with-customized-workload branch from 9c19d97 to c7687bc Compare September 10, 2024 09:05
docs/user-manuals/workloadspread.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
docs/user-manuals/workloadspread.md Show resolved Hide resolved
docs/user-manuals/workloadspread.md Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link
Member

@furykerry furykerry left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

plz update .github/workflows/pre_dict.json to avoid the typo check error

@AiRanthem AiRanthem force-pushed the feature/Use-WorkloadSpread-with-customized-workload branch from a93aa6e to 95a5974 Compare September 12, 2024 06:27
Copy link
Member

@furykerry furykerry left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@AiRanthem AiRanthem force-pushed the feature/Use-WorkloadSpread-with-customized-workload branch from 95a5974 to 527623d Compare September 12, 2024 06:47
Copy link
Member

@furykerry furykerry left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@zmberg zmberg merged commit cc4ea61 into openkruise:master Sep 12, 2024
5 of 6 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants