Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: add component preview to library authoring [FC-0062] #1242

Conversation

rpenido
Copy link
Contributor

@rpenido rpenido commented Aug 30, 2024

Description

This PR adds an XBlock preview to the library authoring sidebar.
image

More information

Part of:

Depends on:

Testing Instructions

  • Checkout this branch and feat: new URL to render a v2 xblock in an iframe [FC-0062] edx-platform#35473
  • Open the library authoring home for a library with some components
  • Click on the component and check the preview on the sidebar. You can't interact with the XBlock here.
  • Clicking on expand should open a modal dialog with the component preview. In this preview, you can interact with the XBlock

Private ref: FAL-3801

@openedx-webhooks openedx-webhooks added the open-source-contribution PR author is not from Axim or 2U label Aug 30, 2024
@openedx-webhooks
Copy link

openedx-webhooks commented Aug 30, 2024

Thanks for the pull request, @rpenido!

What's next?

Please work through the following steps to get your changes ready for engineering review:

🔘 Get product approval

If you haven't already, check this list to see if your contribution needs to go through the product review process.

  • If it does, you'll need to submit a product proposal for your contribution, and have it reviewed by the Product Working Group.
    • This process (including the steps you'll need to take) is documented here.
  • If it doesn't, simply proceed with the next step.

🔘 Provide context

To help your reviewers and other members of the community understand the purpose and larger context of your changes, feel free to add as much of the following information to the PR description as you can:

  • Dependencies

    This PR must be merged before / after / at the same time as ...

  • Blockers

    This PR is waiting for OEP-1234 to be accepted.

  • Timeline information

    This PR must be merged by XX date because ...

  • Partner information

    This is for a course on edx.org.

  • Supporting documentation
  • Relevant Open edX discussion forum threads

🔘 Get a green build

If one or more checks are failing, continue working on your changes until this is no longer the case and your build turns green.

🔘 Let us know that your PR is ready for review:

Who will review my changes?

This repository is currently maintained by @openedx/2u-tnl. Tag them in a comment and let them know that your changes are ready for review.

Where can I find more information?

If you'd like to get more details on all aspects of the review process for open source pull requests (OSPRs), check out the following resources:

When can I expect my changes to be merged?

Our goal is to get community contributions seen and reviewed as efficiently as possible.

However, the amount of time that it takes to review and merge a PR can vary significantly based on factors such as:

  • The size and impact of the changes that it introduces
  • The need for product review
  • Maintenance status of the parent repository

💡 As a result it may take up to several weeks or months to complete a review and merge your PR.

@rpenido rpenido force-pushed the rpenido/fal-3801-component-sidebar-preview-tab branch 4 times, most recently from 9c73221 to 46f4dcb Compare August 30, 2024 19:10
@rpenido rpenido force-pushed the rpenido/fal-3801-component-sidebar-preview-tab branch from 46f4dcb to 70cd2ef Compare August 30, 2024 20:33
@rpenido rpenido force-pushed the rpenido/fal-3801-component-sidebar-preview-tab branch from 6f1d198 to 1c509b6 Compare August 30, 2024 20:49
Copy link

codecov bot commented Aug 30, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 92.33%. Comparing base (fd48fef) to head (d2edd55).
Report is 8 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #1242      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   92.31%   92.33%   +0.02%     
==========================================
  Files        1013     1020       +7     
  Lines       18733    18838     +105     
  Branches     3947     3956       +9     
==========================================
+ Hits        17293    17395     +102     
- Misses       1374     1377       +3     
  Partials       66       66              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@rpenido rpenido force-pushed the rpenido/fal-3801-component-sidebar-preview-tab branch from 0c8c047 to 4c4905d Compare September 11, 2024 18:53
@rpenido rpenido changed the title feat: add component preview to library authoring feat: add component preview to library authoring [FC-0062] Sep 11, 2024
@rpenido rpenido force-pushed the rpenido/fal-3801-component-sidebar-preview-tab branch from 4c4905d to a9847d2 Compare September 11, 2024 19:14
@rpenido rpenido force-pushed the rpenido/fal-3801-component-sidebar-preview-tab branch from a9847d2 to 0e9b907 Compare September 11, 2024 19:56
@rpenido rpenido marked this pull request as ready for review September 12, 2024 21:09
@rpenido rpenido requested a review from a team as a code owner September 12, 2024 21:09
Copy link
Contributor

@ChrisChV ChrisChV left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@rpenido Looks good. Great work! Some small nits 👍

One question. The Expand button overlaps the text on some components. is that expected?

image

  • I tested this: I followed the testing instructions and I tested with multiple component types.
  • I read through the code and considered the security, stability and performance implications of the changes.
  • I tested that the UI can be used with a keyboard only (tab order, keyboard controls).
  • Includes tests for bugfixes and/or features added.
  • Includes documentation
  • Includes fixtures that create objects required for manual testing.

Comment on lines 34 to 37
// const frame = iframeRef.current.contentWindow;
// const sendReply = async (data) => {
// frame?.postMessage({ ...data, replyKey }, '*');
// };
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think we can delete this commented code?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Fixed here: 0ed8e02

@@ -53,11 +53,10 @@ export const libraryAuthoringQueryKeys = {
'libraryBlockTypes',
],
xblockFields: (contentLibraryId: string, usageKey: string) => [
...libraryAuthoringQueryKeys.all,
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@rpenido Why is this being deleted? If the query libraryAuthoringQueryKeys.all is invalidated, then xblockFields is not invalidated.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sorry. Not intended! This was fixed after I merged the last changes.

@rpenido
Copy link
Contributor Author

rpenido commented Sep 13, 2024

Thanks for your review @ChrisChV!
I addressed the issues you found.

One question. The Expand button overlaps the text on some components. is that expected?

Yes! I think this was the intention of the design.
We can't change it if it is an issue in the UI/UX review.

@bradenmacdonald
Copy link
Contributor

@rpenido At a very specific browser window height, there is some weird issue at the bottom of the modal:

Screenshot

Most other heights it appears fine but if you resize it, you'll see this issue. Also it seems weird that there are two close buttons on the modal. Can we just remove the "bottom bar" of the modal (get rid of "Close", but keep the "X"), or was that specified by the UX team?

@rpenido
Copy link
Contributor Author

rpenido commented Sep 13, 2024

weird issue at the bottom of the modal

I think this is an issue with the Paragon modal introduced after changing the overflow behavior.
Tomorrow, I'll check other Paragon components to remove the Close button and see if it reduces the chance of this happening again.

Copy link
Contributor

@bradenmacdonald bradenmacdonald left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good! Just some minor comments. Ping me on Mattermost if/when you want me to hit merge.

src/library-authoring/LibraryBlock/LibraryBlock.tsx Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/library-authoring/LibraryBlock/LibraryBlock.tsx Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
>
{intl.formatMessage(messages.previewExpandButtonTitle)}
</Button>
<LibraryBlock usageKey={usageKey} />
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

In the future, it would be awesome to use something like react-reverse-portal to "re-parent" the <LibraryBlock> so that it moves from the sidebar to the modal instead of being copied into the modal. Then for example, you could start playing a video in the sidebar and "Expand" it and it would still be playing in the modal. Please mention that to the UX team as a possible future improvement after this merges (and post MVP).

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sure! I will mention that!

@rpenido
Copy link
Contributor Author

rpenido commented Sep 14, 2024

Thank you for your review @bradenmacdonald.
I removed the footer close button.
I tried other modal components, but the issue in Paragon affects all of them. 😞

I think this is ready to merge!

@bradenmacdonald bradenmacdonald merged commit 121ced4 into openedx:master Sep 14, 2024
7 checks passed
@bradenmacdonald bradenmacdonald deleted the rpenido/fal-3801-component-sidebar-preview-tab branch September 14, 2024 17:03
@mphilbrick211 mphilbrick211 added the FC Relates to an Axim Funded Contribution project label Sep 17, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
FC Relates to an Axim Funded Contribution project open-source-contribution PR author is not from Axim or 2U
Projects
Archived in project
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants