Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[readme]: clarify that lts/* points to the active LTS #2691

Draft
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

paulirish
Copy link

IMO https://nodejs.org/en/about/releases/ could do a better job clarifying that "current" is a non-LTS classification

but regardless.. lts/* is basically like a lts/active .. but since that other page is kinda weak on distinguishing "current" from "active lts", i think this small addition helps. :)

jordan if you think i should propose some wording changes to /releases i'm happy to followup with that, as well.

@ljharb
Copy link
Member

ljharb commented Dec 16, 2021

Hi Paul!

"active" implies a support date, and lts/* locally will point to whatever version you have installed that is the latest version in the latest known LTS line.

If the last time you ran nvm ls-remote or nvm install, Argon was the latest release line (which is now EOL), and you have v4.9.1 installed, then lts/* and lts/argon will both point to it.

"active" or "inactive" aren't concepts nvm captures, in other words - just "everything" or "LTS" (which current isn't).

I'm happy to clarify that the release schedule's "Current" is not considered LTS, but i don't want to get into whether a line is active or not, or supported or not.

README.md Show resolved Hide resolved
@ljharb ljharb marked this pull request as draft December 23, 2022 20:20
@ljharb ljharb force-pushed the master branch 2 times, most recently from c6cfc3a to c20db2a Compare June 10, 2024 18:13
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants