Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add interpolated BEAN number for animation use #470

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

lionleaf
Copy link
Member

Adds new global variable INTERBEAN, which is a float that is
interpolated between BEAN numbers, in a linear way between frames.
This can be used to key animations without getting the lower frame rate
of BEAN.

Discussion to be had here: Can we instead change BEAN to have fractional values? The way I see it that would be the preferred option here, but I'm afraid of changing behaviour if people have already relied on it being an integer somewhere.

Adds new global variable INTERBEAN, which is a float that is
interpolated between BEAN numbers, in a linear way between frames.
This can be used to key animations without getting the lower frame rate
of BEAN.
@lionleaf
Copy link
Member Author

INTERBEAN is also a bit long name for a variable you might repeat a ton of times while writing animations, anyone have a better suggestion? FBEAN? (float bean) BEAF?

Copy link
Member

@sigvef sigvef left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I imagine INTERBEAN might be piecewise linear from bean to bean, but have different slopes depending the relation between bpm and fps. Perhaps a better approach would be to construct INTERBEAN by just scaling frame to match? Of course, then INTERBEAN and BEAN wouldn't necessarily be equal when BEAT is true, which might not be optimal either 🤔

@lionleaf
Copy link
Member Author

Not sure I follow. This PR would make INTERBEAN piecewise linear with the slope depending on bpm and fps already, right?

@sigvef
Copy link
Member

sigvef commented Oct 25, 2021

There is no guarantee that there is a fixed number of frames in each BEAN. In this example, bpm is 125, subdivision is 4 and fps is 60.

Not a completely straight line:

So, if you were to use INTERBEAN e.g. like this:

this.ball.position.x = Math.sin(INTERBEAN);

then the animation will speed up and slow down ever so slightly all the time.

@lionleaf
Copy link
Member Author

Yes, we agree about the current behaviour then. It is piecewise linear and certainly not just a straight line.

I went back to find the original use case that motivated this:

https://github.com/ninjadev/revision-invite-2018/blob/5b66355f75b18e894dcfcd2d257420f4dbee99d9/src/OrthoCubeNode.js#L29

Basically it's used for animations between states that complete on a beat. (In this case the rotation of the cube).

And since there could be different amounts of frames between beats you do want the rotation speed to vary.

You're right though, this could easily be used in scenarios where you want/expect a constant speed.

An alternative that would also solve the motivating scenario would be a number that goes 0.0 -> 1.0 between each beat?

@lionleaf
Copy link
Member Author

Also happy to make the decision that this is more confusing than useful and close this PR.

@sigvef
Copy link
Member

sigvef commented Oct 25, 2021

Maybe we can just give it a name that implies the piece-wise-ness strongly enough and merge that.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants