Skip to content

mrahtz/ultra_ping

Repository files navigation

ULTRA_PING

Hey you!

Do you want to characterise UDP packet latency on your network?

Are you sick and tired of boring old tools like ping?

Try new ultra_ping! You can:

  • Measure the time it takes for UDP packets to get across your network

But...uhh...wait, there's more! You can also:

  • See what happens at different data send rates!
  • Try different packet sizes!
  • Measure packet latency from multiple sending hosts simultaneously!
  • Measure one-way latency (requires separate hardware timer sold separately as well as round-trip latency
  • Save a list of latencies for each packet...TO A FILE!

What's that you say? Plain ol' ping does most of these things? Well...uhhh...

No, but seriously

More seriously, this was written for a project involving a whole bunch of Raspberry Pis sending real-time audio data to a phone, where we wanted to check what the distribution of packet loss looked like. ping was an option, but

  • a) we weren't sure how comparable ICMP results would be to UDP, and
  • b) we wanted to be able to measure one-way latency rather than round-trip latency (in case there were nonlinearities which would lead to a difference other than just a factor of two in latencies).

Usage

ultraping comes in two versions: echo.py (for round-trip tests) and quack.py (for one-way tests - because everyone knows that quacks don't echo). Both have the same usage: on one host you run the script in server mode, e.g.:

./echo.py --server

and on the other host you run the script in client mode:

./echo.py --client <IP address of server>

Once all packets have been received back (or a timeout has been reached because some packets never made it), latencies are written to a file udp_packetn_latency_pairs. The format of this file is:

  • First line: total number of packets sent
  • Remaining lines: packet number (in order of transmission) and latency for that packet number

Depending on whether you're running echo.py or quack.py, the behaviour is a little different:

  • In echo mode, the server just receives packets and sends them back to whatever client sent them, and latency measurement is done on the client. The packet latencies file therefore get written by the script on the client host. The server will stay alive until you kill it.
  • In quack mode, latency measurement is done on the server, so packet latencies get written on the server host. The server will stay alive until all packets have been sent by the client.

More than one client can be run at a time with no problems. In quack mode, make sure to start all the clients at the same time in order for the server to count all clients as part of the same test. In this case, latencies will be saved for each client separately as udp_packetn_latency_pairs_<n> where <n> is the ID of each client as guessed from the client's hostname (see guess_host_id()).

To see all the different parameters you can tune (e.g. packet size/packet send rate), see --help.

Latency Measurement

Round-trip latency measurement is pretty simple: the client records the current system time in a packet, sends it off to the server, the server bounces it back, and then the client calculates the latency based on the difference between the new system time and the transmission time contained in the packet.

One-way latency measurements are a little more complicated, because they require both the client and server to have access to a synchronised time source. You might be able to do this by just synchronising the clocks on both hosts with NTP (http://www.ntp.org/ntpfaq/NTP-s-algo.htm#Q-ACCURATE-CLOCK reckons you should be able to get an accuracy of a few milliseconds with direct connections between the two hosts), but we wanted to be surer of our measurements, so we opted for a hardware timer accessible to both hosts. (In our case, this was a counter on an FPGA (on a ValentF(x) LOGI Pi) connected to both hosts via SPI. This actually didn't work too well for us in the end - there was some funny analog thing going on that reduced Wi-Fi signal strength when we would connect everything together. Maybe our cable just needed more grounding or something but we didn't have time to investigate.) (If you also want to do something similar using a LOGI Pi, you'll need the logi package from https://github.com/fpga-logi/logi-tools.)

But wait, there's more!

OK, you have your file with a bunch of latencies. But aren't you itching to do some analysis on all that data?

We've got you covered. Check out analysis/latency_measurement_graphs.py. This script will plot you a timeseries of packet latencies with overlaid bars showing what percentage of packets were delayed more than N milliseconds, and also a histogram of packet latencies. Call it with one or more udp_packetn_latency files; it'll plot you the data from all of them. For example:

packet latency timeseries packet latency histogram

TODOs

  • Write tests for the analysis code.

About

Measure UDP packet latency

Resources

License

Stars

Watchers

Forks

Releases

No releases published

Packages

No packages published

Contributors 3

  •  
  •  
  •  

Languages