Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Adding test cases for the class DiffMotionDetector in the motion_dete… #107

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

Umair0343
Copy link

…ction.py file

@Umair0343
Copy link
Author

Umair0343 commented Sep 30, 2023

Description:
This pull request addresses issue #77: "Add Unit Tests." I have added unit tests for the class DiffMotionDetector in the motion_detection.py file to improve test coverage and ensure the correctness of the code.

Changes Made:

  • Added file test.py containing the unit tests.
  • Added background.jpg and foreground.jpg files. These images are passed to the test cases as demo images.

Testing Done:

  • These test cases have been created, checked and verified using CodiumAI.

Related Issues:
Closes #77

@mpatacchiola
Copy link
Owner

Thank you for the proposal. The test file looks good but its location is not appropriate. You placed the test file and the images under the deepgaze folder, which contains the main library.

Please create a tests folder outside of the deepgaze one and include a sub-folder called test_diff_motion_detector. You can include the two images in the same folder. Call the test file test_diff_motion_detector.py. The overall structure should be:

|--deepgaze
|--doc
|--etc
|--examples
|--tests
|    ^--test_diff_motion_detector
|         ^-- test_diff_motion_detector.py
|         ^-- background.jpg
|         ^-- foreground.jpg

Let me know if this is clear and thank you for your help!

@Umair0343
Copy link
Author

@CodiumAI-Agent /describe

@CodiumAI-Agent
Copy link

Title

Adding test cases for the class DiffMotionDetector in the motion_dete…


User description

…ction.py file


PR Type

Tests


Description

  • Added comprehensive test cases for the DiffMotionDetector class in the deepgaze module.
  • Implemented tests to verify successful setting and retrieval of background images.
  • Tested the return of binary images after the detection process.
  • Included tests to handle None inputs for both background and foreground images.

Changes walkthrough 📝

Relevant files
Tests
test.py
Add test cases for DiffMotionDetector class                           

deepgaze/test.py

  • Added test cases for DiffMotionDetector class.
  • Tested background image setting and retrieval.
  • Tested binary image return after detection.
  • Included tests for handling None inputs.
  • +54/-0   

    💡 PR-Agent usage: Comment /help "your question" on any pull request to receive relevant information

    @Umair0343
    Copy link
    Author

    @CodiumAI-Agent /review

    @CodiumAI-Agent
    Copy link

    CodiumAI-Agent commented Nov 30, 2024

    PR Reviewer Guide 🔍

    (Review updated until commit e2de4ca)

    Here are some key observations to aid the review process:

    ⏱️ Estimated effort to review: 2 🔵🔵⚪⚪⚪
    🧪 PR contains tests
    🔒 No security concerns identified
    ⚡ Recommended focus areas for review

    Test Redundancy
    There are redundant tests for setting and getting a None background image. Consider combining them or removing unnecessary repetitions to streamline the test suite.

    @Umair0343
    Copy link
    Author

    @CodiumAI-Agent /review

    @CodiumAI-Agent
    Copy link

    Persistent review updated to latest commit e2de4ca

    @Umair0343
    Copy link
    Author

    @CodiumAI-Agent /ask Does this code follow project coding standards and best practices?

    @CodiumAI-Agent
    Copy link

    Ask

    Does this code follow project coding standards and best practices?

    Answer:

    Based on the provided diff, here are some observations regarding coding standards and best practices:

    1. Test Structure and Naming:

      • The test class TestDiffMotionDetector is well-structured, and the test methods are named clearly, indicating their purpose. This follows good practices for readability and maintainability.
    2. Use of Assertions:

      • The tests use assert statements to verify expected outcomes, which is standard practice in testing. However, using pytest's assert is appropriate here as it provides better error messages when a test fails.
    3. Handling of External Resources:

      • The tests rely on images ('background.jpg' and 'foreground.jpg') being available in the file system. It would be better to mock the image loading or use in-memory images to make the tests more robust and independent of external files.
    4. Testing for None Values:

      • The tests include cases for handling None values, which is good for ensuring robustness against invalid inputs.
    5. No Newline at End of File:

      • There is a missing newline at the end of the file, which is generally considered a best practice in many coding standards to avoid potential issues with file concatenation and version control diffs.
    6. Imports:

      • The imports are correctly placed at the top of the file, following Python conventions. However, it might be beneficial to group standard library imports and third-party imports separately for clarity.
    7. Code Comments:

      • The comments above each test method provide a brief description of what the test is verifying, which is helpful for understanding the purpose of each test.

    Overall, the code largely follows good practices for writing tests, but improvements could be made in handling external resources and ensuring a newline at the end of the file.

    @Umair0343
    Copy link
    Author

    @CodiumAI-Agent /improve

    @CodiumAI-Agent
    Copy link

    PR Code Suggestions ✨

    CategorySuggestion                                                                                                                                    Score
    Possible issue
    Add error handling for missing or unreadable image files

    Ensure that the file paths for images are validated or handled to manage cases where
    the file does not exist or is unreadable.

    deepgaze/test.py [21-22]

     background_image = cv2.imread('background.jpg')
    +if background_image is None:
    +    raise FileNotFoundError("The background image file does not exist or is unreadable.")
     foreground_image = cv2.imread('foreground.jpg')
    +if foreground_image is None:
    +    raise FileNotFoundError("The foreground image file does not exist or is unreadable.")
    Suggestion importance[1-10]: 7

    Why: Adding error handling for file read operations enhances the robustness of the test suite by ensuring that the tests fail gracefully when image files are missing or unreadable, rather than failing with a less clear error later in the code execution.

    7

    Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
    Labels
    None yet
    Projects
    None yet
    Development

    Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

    3 participants