Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Formatting and nits #115

Merged
merged 7 commits into from
Oct 2, 2023
Merged

Formatting and nits #115

merged 7 commits into from
Oct 2, 2023

Conversation

fiestajetsam
Copy link
Collaborator

This looks like a big PR, but really it's just a lot of small nits and spelling corrections - there are no editorial or structural changes present.

This appears to be a big pull request, but in reality all that changes is all
the additional new lines (and some double-spacing-after-period).
I'm both outnumbered and outgunned on this one sadly, but Oxford comma is
staying, that you won't take from me!
Copy link
Collaborator

@SpencerDawkins SpencerDawkins left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This works for me. I made a couple of suggestions, but I know you'll Do The Right Thing.

draft-ietf-moq-requirements.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
draft-ietf-moq-requirements.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
draft-ietf-moq-requirements.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
draft-ietf-moq-requirements.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
draft-ietf-moq-requirements.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@fiestajetsam fiestajetsam merged commit 256f260 into main Oct 2, 2023
2 checks passed
@fiestajetsam fiestajetsam deleted the format branch October 2, 2023 18:53
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants