-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 9
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Auditing timescaledb #565
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Auditing timescaledb #565
Conversation
rootCmd.Flags().String("auditing-meili-url", "http://localhost:7700", "url of the auditing service") | ||
rootCmd.Flags().String("auditing-meili-api-key", "secret", "api key for the auditing service") | ||
rootCmd.Flags().String("auditing-meili-index-prefix", "auditing", "auditing index prefix") | ||
rootCmd.Flags().String("auditing-meili-index-interval", "@daily", "auditing index creation interval, can be one of @hourly|@daily|@monthly") | ||
rootCmd.Flags().Int64("auditing-meili-keep", 14, "the amount of indexes to keep until cleanup") |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I would prefer to remove the support for meilisearch completely instead of adding the complexity of supporting multiple auditing backends
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Maybe we will have introduce multiple backends though if FI-TS wants to have Splunk connected. But maybe also we want to introduce the buffer service as well, which we were discussing as well.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
in my opinion, metal-api should only have one auditing implementation, if other parties are interested in other auditing backends, then this should be solved at a later layer.
This is why i would like to vote for a dedicated auditing backend which has plug-able backends
No description provided.