Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Auditing timescaledb #565

Draft
wants to merge 4 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Draft

Auditing timescaledb #565

wants to merge 4 commits into from

Conversation

Gerrit91
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

Comment on lines +291 to +295
rootCmd.Flags().String("auditing-meili-url", "http://localhost:7700", "url of the auditing service")
rootCmd.Flags().String("auditing-meili-api-key", "secret", "api key for the auditing service")
rootCmd.Flags().String("auditing-meili-index-prefix", "auditing", "auditing index prefix")
rootCmd.Flags().String("auditing-meili-index-interval", "@daily", "auditing index creation interval, can be one of @hourly|@daily|@monthly")
rootCmd.Flags().Int64("auditing-meili-keep", 14, "the amount of indexes to keep until cleanup")
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I would prefer to remove the support for meilisearch completely instead of adding the complexity of supporting multiple auditing backends

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Maybe we will have introduce multiple backends though if FI-TS wants to have Splunk connected. But maybe also we want to introduce the buffer service as well, which we were discussing as well.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

in my opinion, metal-api should only have one auditing implementation, if other parties are interested in other auditing backends, then this should be solved at a later layer.
This is why i would like to vote for a dedicated auditing backend which has plug-able backends

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants