Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

🔧 [open-zaak/open-zaak#1629] Refactor base settings #17

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Jul 11, 2024

Conversation

stevenbal
Copy link
Contributor

@stevenbal stevenbal commented Jun 27, 2024

Partially fixes open-zaak/open-zaak#1629

Changes

  • Refactor base settings

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Jun 27, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 92.23%. Comparing base (9673b85) to head (5f1b466).
Report is 2 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master      #17      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   92.24%   92.23%   -0.02%     
==========================================
  Files          54       53       -1     
  Lines        1148     1043     -105     
==========================================
- Hits         1059      962      -97     
+ Misses         89       81       -8     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@stevenbal stevenbal force-pushed the feature/refactor-settings branch 8 times, most recently from f0c314c to d370e0b Compare June 28, 2024 10:08
@stevenbal stevenbal marked this pull request as ready for review June 28, 2024 12:38
@@ -12,6 +12,9 @@ services:
volumes:
- ./docker-init-db.sql:/docker-entrypoint-initdb.d/init_db.sql

redis:
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please add warning to CHANGELOG that redis is needed now

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

And could you also add warning about using 2FA in the CHANGELOG (We use it now, right?)

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@joeribekker Do you think it's needed to add warnings? Afaik there hasn't been an official release of referentielijsten yet

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Adding a warning in the changelog can't hurt though

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

added warnings for them

src/referentielijsten/conf/base.py Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link
Contributor

@Coperh Coperh left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Good, just one suggestion and a comment

src/referentielijsten/conf/base.py Show resolved Hide resolved
src/referentielijsten/conf/base.py Show resolved Hide resolved
@stevenbal stevenbal requested a review from Coperh July 5, 2024 14:30
@stevenbal stevenbal merged commit f8b8fdf into master Jul 11, 2024
11 checks passed
@stevenbal stevenbal deleted the feature/refactor-settings branch July 11, 2024 07:37
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

As PO I want to streamline all environment variables.
6 participants