🐛[#449] support objecttypes API with pagination #454
Conversation
| v2_service = ServiceFactory( | ||
| api_root=self.object_types_api.format(version="v2"), | ||
| auth_type=AuthTypes.api_key, | ||
| header_key="Authorization", | ||
| header_value="Token 5cebbb33ffa725b6ed5e9e98300061218ba98d71", |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Should a docker container be made for objecttypes for testing here?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I think so. We should be able to change and modify these tests.
If you decide to use vcr let's make sure we can reuse it:
- please add docker-compose with Objecttypes
- add fixture for Obejcttypes if you use it
- add README which describes how to use it if you want to update cassettes
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I've split this into a separate issue #457
Coperh
force-pushed
the
feature/449-Permission-admin-500
branch
from
caea548
to
bca880e
Compare
|
Idk why this is failing, I'll look into it later edit: fixed |
Coperh
force-pushed
the
feature/449-Permission-admin-500
branch
from
bca880e
to
c465f53
Compare
| v2_service = ServiceFactory( | ||
| api_root=self.object_types_api.format(version="v2"), | ||
| auth_type=AuthTypes.api_key, | ||
| header_key="Authorization", | ||
| header_value="Token 5cebbb33ffa725b6ed5e9e98300061218ba98d71", |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I think so. We should be able to change and modify these tests.
If you decide to use vcr let's make sure we can reuse it:
- please add docker-compose with Objecttypes
- add fixture for Obejcttypes if you use it
- add README which describes how to use it if you want to update cassettes
Coperh
force-pushed
the
feature/449-Permission-admin-500
branch
2 times, most recently
from
3e1098e
to
6baedab
Compare
| @@ -52,6 +52,10 @@ def get_data_field_choices(self): | |||
| except requests.JSONDecodeError: | |||
| continue | |||
|
|
|||
| # TODO: remove check once API V1 is removed | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This check will be pointless once Objectstypes API V1 is discontinued
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #454 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 95.18% 95.31% +0.13%
==========================================
Files 150 155 +5
Lines 5105 5485 +380
==========================================
+ Hits 4859 5228 +369
- Misses 246 257 +11
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
| form = response.context["adminform"].form | ||
| choices = list(form.fields["object_type"].choices) | ||
|
|
||
| self.assertEqual( | ||
| choices[1][0].value, | ||
| object_type.id, | ||
| ) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I feel like there was an easier way to check this with normal Django but maybe I'm thinking of webtest.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
hmm yeah I think that's probably webtest
| form = response.context["adminform"].form | ||
| choices = list(form.fields["object_type"].choices) | ||
|
|
||
| self.assertEqual( | ||
| choices[1][0].value, | ||
| object_type.id, | ||
| ) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
hmm yeah I think that's probably webtest
|
|
||
| self.assertEqual( | ||
| choices[1][0].value, | ||
| object_type.id, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
bit of a nitpick, but is it possible to check the label here as well? Currently it will probably just check if the value is 1, which doesn't really say a lot 😬
Coperh
force-pushed
the
feature/449-Permission-admin-500
branch
from
6baedab
to
36f9c6f
Compare
Fixes #449
Supports paginated response from OT V2