Skip to content
/ CompSign Public

CompSign: An R package for differential abundance of compositional mutational signatures

Notifications You must be signed in to change notification settings

lm687/CompSign

Folders and files

NameName
Last commit message
Last commit date

Latest commit

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Repository files navigation

logo

CompSign: An R package for differential abundance of compositional mutational signatures

Lena Morrill Gavarró 2024

Installation

Pandoc is required to build R Markdown vignettes - please install it before installing the package as follows:

install.packages('devtools') ## if needed
library(devtools)
devtools::install_github("lm687/CompSign", build_vignettes = TRUE)

Vignettes

We recommend browing the vignettes for a more in-depth explanation of models and the functioning of the package, several examples of input data, how to run several models, and how to interpret the results. You can find the vignette here:

browseVignettes("CompSign")

Brief summary of the package

This is a minimal example for running the model and extracting the estimated coefficients.

Input dataset

The input dataset is the argument object, which is a list with the following structure:

  • x: covariate matrix (p x n)
  • z: matrix of random effects indicating which patient-specific subsample belongs to which patient (n x N)
  • Y (n x d)

Fitting the model

The function wrapper_run_TMB() is used to run all variations of the model.

A minimal example is:

diagDM_no_small_sigs <- wrapper_run_TMB(object = simplified_object,
                                        model = "diagRE_DM", use_nlminb=T, smart_init_vals=F)

in which simplified_object is a list containing simplified_object$x, simplified_object$z, simplified_object$Y. The object input for wrapper_run_TMB is always a list containing a matrix of covariates x, a matrix of observations Y and a matrix matching observations patients and the labels corresponding to the random effects. All three matrices should have the same number of rows - the number of observations. In this case, simplified_object corresponds to the nucleotides abundances in clonal and subclonal mutations in the Lung-AdenoCA cohort. simplified_object$x, contains two columns (a column of 1 for the intercept and a column of 0 and 1 indicating whether the observation corresponds to clonal (0) or subclonal (1) mutations. simplified_object$z contains a matrix where each observation is paired with its corresponding patient, simplified_object$Y is a matrix of counts for the nucleotide abundances for each patient and (clonal/subclonal) group.

Here we are using the model diagRE_DM, which is a mixed-effect Dirichlet-multinomial model with non-correlated random effects and two dispersion parameters (one per group). See below for the list of alternative models available.

Data included in CompSign

You can load simplified_object, as well as several other example datasets, using the data funtion:

data(package='CompSign')
data(simplified_object)

Testing for differential abundance

Depending on the model, the output of wrapper_run_TMB contains the estimated values of different coefficients. The parameters of interest are beta_0, beta_1 and lambda. Both beta are values in log-ratio space in with respect to the last category included in the input object for wrapper_run_TMB (i.e. the last colun of object$Y). beta_0 indicates the coefficient for the baseline - in the two-group example of simplified_object, this baseline reflects the abundance in the first (clonal) group. beta_1 indicates the cofficient for the second column - here representing the difference between clonal and subclonal mutations. If beta_1 is a vector of 0, this indicates that none of the log-ratios of abundances have changed between the two groups, and hence that there is no differential abundance.

To test for differential abundance, a generalised Wald test can be used with the function wald_TMB_wrapper, which gives a p-value as output:

wald_TMB_wrapper(diagDM_no_small_sigs)

Visualising the output

The estimated beta coefficients can be visualised as follows:

library(ggplot2)
plot_betas(diagDM_no_small_sigs, return_ggplot = T)

The interest of the user is generally on which categories increase or decrease in absolute terms. This is not possible in compositional data, but, assuming that the abundance of most categories does not change, we can visualise which categories deviate highly from the median coefficient. This visualisation can be generated with plot_betas_minimal_perturbation. The red line is the line of “zero perturbation” and for each estimate its 95% confidence interval is shown in blue. We can consider a signature to be differentially abundant if the line of “zero perturbation” is not included in the confidence interval of its coefficient for differential abundance. Note that we draw conclusions for the signatures included in the numerator of the log-ratios, but we are unable to get equivalent results for the baseline signature (although it is used to compute the line of “zero perturbation”).

plot_betas_minimal_perturbation(diagDM_no_small_sigs)

Usage for mutational signatures

In the example above, nucleotide abundances are used as input. Alternatively, mutational signatures (as counts) and be used instead. If signatures have not yet been extracted, this can be done with the wrapper function extract_sigs_TMB_obj and using as input a mutation matrix (commonly, a matrix with trinucleotide mutations; see more details in the Vignette).

CompSign has been applied to study the differences in mutational signatures between clonal and subclonal mutations in the PCAWG dataset. The github repository reproducing these results can be found here.

Variations of the model

There are several variations on the model, each with a particular combination of the following:

  • Base model: Dirichlet-multinomial in most cases, but two simpler models -- multinomial models diagRE_M and fullRE_M are implemented for comparison.
  • Random effects: correlated or not (e.g. uncorrelated in diagRE_DM, correlated in fullRE_DM).
  • Number of dispersion parameters: generally one per group (e.g. in diagRE_DM), but possibly fewer or more if specified in the name (e.g. one single dipersion parameter in diagRE_DM_singlelambda, one dispersion parameter per patient in diagRE_DM_patientlambda).

The names of the model correspond to {random effects}_{base model}_{particularities of the dispersion parameter, if any}.

The first column is the <model> argument in the function wrapper_run_TMB().

Name of model (for user) Description and usage
FE_DM_singlelambda Dirichlet-multinomial with no RE and a single lambda which can be used in a two-group comparison (if we consider the dipersion to be the same in both groups), a multi-group comparison, or any regression setting.
FE_DM Dirichlet-multinomial with no random effects and two lambda, used for the comparison between two groups in which we want to account for group-specific dispersion. Model slightly more complex than FE_DM_singlelambda
diagRE_M Multinomial with non-correlated multivariate effects. Simpler model than diagRE_DM, as no dispersion is included
diagRE_DM_singlelambda Dirichlet-multinomial with non-correlated multivariate RE and one: equivalent of diagRE_DM but with a shared . It can be used in a two-group comparison (if we consider the dipersion to be the same in both groups), a multi-group comparison, or any regression setting.
singleRE_DM Dirichlet-multinomial with a single RE intercept and two lambda: simple model in which random effects are not multivariate, but where group-specific dispersion is needed, in a two-group comparison.
diagRE_DM Dirichlet-multinomial with independent RE and two lambda: used most commonly throughout the paper. The data are matched to warrant multivariate RE, but correlations between categories are not explicitly modelled. Faster than fullRE_DM with often comparable results for beta_1.
fullRE_DM_singlelambda Dirichlet-multinomial with correlated RE and two lambdab: equivalent of diagR_DM_singlelambda that can be used if categories have strong correlations.
fullRE_M Multinomial with correlated RE: assuming no overdispersion, it can be used in any regression setting
fullRE_DM Dirichlet-multinomial with correlated RE and two lambda: model with multivariate RE with correlations modelled explicitly. As a (K-1)*(K-1) covariance matrix is estimated, this model is not recommended where the ratio of signatures to samples is high.
diagRE_DM_patientlambda Dirichlet-multinomial with non-correlated RE and one lambda$ per patient: model more complex than diag_RE_DM that can be used when there are several observations per patient and we wish to include a patient-specific dispersion parameter
fullRE_DM_patientlambda Dirichlet-multinomial with correlated RE and one per patient: equivalent of diagRE_DM_patientlambda, but modelling correlations between categories

About

CompSign: An R package for differential abundance of compositional mutational signatures

Topics

Resources

Stars

Watchers

Forks

Releases

No releases published

Packages

No packages published