Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fixed an issue where transaction indexes of block could be lost, #980

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

yujianxian
Copy link

The problems I encountered:

I have done customization development in WriteBlock(block, pindex) and WriteBlock(block, pindex) maybe return false, where i restart the node and find that the transaction cannot be obtained through the transaction index

Here's why:
If run Commit() first, then WriteBlock(block, pindex), At this time, the transaction indexed of the block has been marked as successfully created, but if WriteBlock(block, pindex) fails to be run, the transaction index is not really created, and the transaction data will not be found out through the transaction index. so WriteBlock(block, pindex) must be executed first before committing () is executed.

If you run Commit() first, then WriteBlock(block, pindex),
At this time, the transaction indexed of the block has been marked as successfully created,
but if WriteBlock(block, pindex) fails to be run, the transaction index is not really created, and the transaction data will not be found out through the transaction index.
Copy link

@Kingjayveeoner Kingjayveeoner left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

src/index/base.cpp

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants