Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Shade Netty into r2. #780

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Shade Netty into r2. #780

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

jpstewart
Copy link
Contributor

@jpstewart jpstewart commented Apr 13, 2022

Shades Netty into a restli-netty package, with relocates the classes under com.linkedin.pegasus, to avoid conflicts with end users' own Netty version. Based on previous PR, with some modifications and fixes for some outstanding issues inthe shadow plugin and IntelliJ handling for shadowing. (#595).

@jpstewart jpstewart added the backward-incompatible Changes/removes an existing API, requires major version bump. PRs with this label should be bundled. label Apr 13, 2022
CHANGELOG.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@jpstewart jpstewart requested a review from evanw555 May 5, 2022 21:19
@jpstewart jpstewart removed the backward-incompatible Changes/removes an existing API, requires major version bump. PRs with this label should be bundled. label May 12, 2022
@jpstewart jpstewart requested review from FreeMem17 and removed request for nizarm, bbarkley, FranklinYinanDing and aman1309 May 12, 2022 21:41
@jpstewart jpstewart force-pushed the netty-shading branch 4 times, most recently from 9741e9a to d223826 Compare May 19, 2022 22:41
@FreeMem17 FreeMem17 self-requested a review May 24, 2022 01:40
Copy link

@FreeMem17 FreeMem17 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good to me.

Copy link

@li-bsoetarman li-bsoetarman left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

What about the sources jar and the javadoc jar for the shadow? The debugger would not the sources jar.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants