Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(tmo): modify calculation algorithm #700

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

cheney-lin
Copy link
Member

What type of PR is this?

Enhancements

What this PR does / why we need it:

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

Special notes for your reviewer:

@cheney-lin cheney-lin self-assigned this Sep 23, 2024
@cheney-lin cheney-lin added enhancement New feature or request workflow/need-review review: test succeeded, need to review labels Sep 23, 2024
Copy link

codecov bot commented Sep 23, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 0% with 50 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 55.90%. Comparing base (3269ac6) to head (e7597fa).

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
pkg/util/cgroup/manager/cgroup.go 0.00% 31 Missing ⚠️
pkg/util/cgroup/manager/v1/fs_linux.go 0.00% 10 Missing ⚠️
pkg/util/cgroup/manager/v2/fs_linux.go 0.00% 8 Missing ⚠️
...ins/memory/dynamicpolicy/policy_advisor_handler.go 0.00% 1 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #700      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   55.80%   55.90%   +0.10%     
==========================================
  Files         594      594              
  Lines       67830    67873      +43     
==========================================
+ Hits        37850    37943      +93     
+ Misses      25956    25893      -63     
- Partials     4024     4037      +13     
Flag Coverage Δ
unittest 55.90% <0.00%> (+0.10%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request workflow/need-review review: test succeeded, need to review
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant