Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: add MaxNodeUtilizationPercent in ReclaimedResourceConfiguration #592

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

WangZzzhe
Copy link
Collaborator

What type of PR is this?

Enhancements

What this PR does / why we need it:

Add parameter MaxNodeUtilizationPercent,which will be converted to reservedForAllocated to limit the total amount of reclaimed resources.

PR should be updated after kubewharf/katalyst-api#85 is merged

@WangZzzhe WangZzzhe self-assigned this May 23, 2024
@WangZzzhe WangZzzhe added enhancement New feature or request workflow/need-review review: test succeeded, need to review labels May 23, 2024
Copy link

codecov bot commented May 23, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 72.00000% with 7 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 57.03%. Comparing base (99996fc) to head (dbc797f).
Report is 5 commits behind head on main.

Files Patch % Lines
...minqos/reclaimedresource/reclaimedresource_base.go 55.55% 3 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️
...ce/memory/plugin/provisioner/memory_provisioner.go 0.00% 3 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #592      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   57.18%   57.03%   -0.16%     
==========================================
  Files         558      566       +8     
  Lines       54146    54508     +362     
==========================================
+ Hits        30966    31087     +121     
- Misses      19305    19510     +205     
- Partials     3875     3911      +36     
Flag Coverage Δ
unittest 57.03% <72.00%> (-0.16%) ⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

}

c.CPUHeadroomConfiguration.ApplyConfiguration(conf)
c.MemoryHeadroomConfiguration.ApplyConfiguration(conf)
}

func (c *ReclaimedResourceConfiguration) GetReservedResourceForAllocate(nodeResourceList v1.ResourceList) v1.ResourceList {
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It may be better for GetReservedResourceForAllocate to use resource name and quantity as two separate input parameters.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request workflow/need-review review: test succeeded, need to review
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants