-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 17
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
docs: Add use-case examples for instanceTypes #263
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
Signed-off-by: Fabian Deutsch <[email protected]>
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
Nice initiative! Thanks |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Great idea, I'm not sure that Examples
is needed and what about using a label instead to make it somewhat queryable?
@@ -16,6 +16,7 @@ metadata: | |||
In addition, in this series, the NUMA topology of the used | |||
cores is provided to the VM. | |||
instancetype.kubevirt.io/displayName: "Compute Exclusive" | |||
instancetype.kubevirt.io/useCaseExamples: "Databases" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The Examples
seems redundant tbh, what about instancetype.kubevirt.io/useCase
?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
What about plural instancetype.kubevirt.io/useCases
?
Pull requests that are marked with After that period the bot marks them with the label /label needs-approver-review |
What this PR does / why we need it:
Adding examples for what usecase an instanceType is useful.
Which issue(s) this PR fixes (optional, in
fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)
format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged):Fixes #
Special notes for your reviewer:
Release note: