KEP-1287: InPlacePodVerticalScaling BETA update

[tallclair]

• One-line PR description: Update PRR beta requirements sections

• Issue link: In-Place Update of Pod Resources #1287

• Other comments

  • The version skew section needs more consideration
  • Other misc beta blockers are tracked here: https://github.com/orgs/kubernetes/projects/178

[k8s-ci-robot]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: tallclair
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please ask for approval from dchen1107. For more information see the Kubernetes Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• keps/sig-node/OWNERS

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

[k8s-ci-robot]

@tallclair: The following tests failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name	Commit	Details	Required	Rerun command
pull-enhancements-test	68952e4	link	true	/test pull-enhancements-test
pull-enhancements-verify	68952e4	link	true	/test pull-enhancements-verify

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Please help us cut down on flakes by linking to an open issue when you hit one in your PR.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

[esotsal]

Perhaps also addition of a RuntimeHandlerFeature for resize? as commented here

[haircommander]

that's more for the underlying oci runtimes to report features they have available. We could add features to the runtime status object maybe, though I think the runtimes have been compatible for a while unless the design is changing

[tallclair]

On further discussion, we've decided to push this back to v1.32. There are currently too many unresolved edge cases. I'll update this PR soon to highlight those unresolved conditions.

/milestone v1.32

[haircommander]

do you think it could be useful to have this for 1.31 alpha to have that feedback going into beta?

[tallclair]

Yes. I think all the changes discussed for beta can go in while it's still in alpha, but I can specifically prioritize this one.