Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

KEP 1645: clarify the chosen conflict resolution algorithm #4683

Merged

Conversation

MrFreezeex
Copy link
Member

  • One-line PR description: This PR attempt to explain the reasons why the resolution algorithm was chosen by considering other conflict resolution algorithm in the alternatives sections and explaining why those were not selected.
  • Other comments: I tried to consider some other approaches based on what was discussed on the sig-multicluster meeting the 2024/04/30. However as this decision was made several years ago and I tried to fill the gap and imagine the reasons why those alternatives approach were not chosen, those reasons could not fully reflect what was brought up during this KEP original design. So if you remember some other reasons from that time (or any other reasons why we would not want to chose those) feel free to chime in!

This PR attempt to explain the reasons why the resolution algorithm was
chosen by considering other conflict resolution algorithm in the
alternatives sections and explaining why those were not selected.

Signed-off-by: Arthur Outhenin-Chalandre <[email protected]>
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added kind/kep Categorizes KEP tracking issues and PRs modifying the KEP directory cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. labels Jun 2, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added sig/multicluster Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Multicluster. size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Jun 2, 2024
@thockin
Copy link
Member

thockin commented Jun 7, 2024

Thanks!

/lgtm
/approve

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jun 7, 2024
@k8s-triage-robot
Copy link

The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough contributors to adequately respond to all PRs.

This bot triages PRs according to the following rules:

  • After 90d of inactivity, lifecycle/stale is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/stale was applied, lifecycle/rotten is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/rotten was applied, the PR is closed

You can:

  • Mark this PR as fresh with /remove-lifecycle stale
  • Close this PR with /close
  • Offer to help out with Issue Triage

Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.

/lifecycle stale

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Sep 6, 2024
@lauralorenz
Copy link
Contributor

/remove-lifecycle stale

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Sep 6, 2024
@thockin
Copy link
Member

thockin commented Sep 6, 2024

@JeremyOT for multi-cluster approval?

@thockin
Copy link
Member

thockin commented Sep 30, 2024

@skitt

@skitt
Copy link
Member

skitt commented Oct 1, 2024

/approve

Thanks @MrFreezeex!

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: MrFreezeex, skitt, thockin

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Oct 1, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit 749e40e into kubernetes:master Oct 1, 2024
4 checks passed
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added this to the v1.32 milestone Oct 1, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. kind/kep Categorizes KEP tracking issues and PRs modifying the KEP directory lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. sig/multicluster Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Multicluster. size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants